Critics’ reviews

Me and Orson Welles (2008)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 64: 9 positive, 4 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Me and Orson Welles

64
Positive
9
Mixed
4
Negative
2

Most critics find Me and Orson Welles an enjoyable backstage drama, with praise clustering around Christian McKay’s portrayal of Welles. His voice, charisma and forceful ego convince even several reviewers who find the surrounding film disappointing. The theatrical staging is another strength: the reviews credit its precision and attention to performance, while some admire the period detail. The warmer responses find charm and energy in familiar backstage conventions.

Reservations centre on the conventional coming-of-age story, uneven pace and a romance that some find unconvincing. The spread is fairly wide, from enthusiastic approval to complaints of blandness, though McKay remains a point of agreement. Zac Efron divides opinion more sharply: Digital Spy welcomes a change of pace for him, while Variety finds him miscast. Other reviews fault the writing of his role, suggesting that the young protagonist has too little to do beside the commanding Welles.

Empire
31 January 2008 · Kim Newman
80*

Kim Newman praises the film as a satisfying and exhilarating backstage drama. He singles out Christian McKay’s uncanny, charismatic portrayal of Orson Welles.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The critic finds the film entertaining and says it handles its serious intent well, despite lacking the depth to explore Welles’s self-destruction. Christian McKay’s restrained, convincing portrayal of Welles is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 April 2010 · Rob Mackie
75*

Mackie finds the film enjoyable and praises Christian McKay’s portrayal of Orson Welles. He singles out McKay’s convincing resemblance, voice, charisma and ego.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
22 November 2009 · David Denby
75*

Denby finds the film spirited and charming, though its coming-of-age plot is conventional. He especially praises Christian McKay’s portrayal of Welles and the theatrical intelligence behind the production scenes.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
24 November 2009 · Jeff Reichert
70*

Reichert finds the film winning and praises Linklater’s ability to revive familiar backstage-comedy conventions through careful execution. He particularly applauds the precise, rhythmic staging of the film’s abridged opening-night performance of Julius Caesar.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 September 2008 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

Honeycutt finds the film appealing but aimed at a niche art-house audience, with a slow start. He particularly praises Christian McKay’s uncanny performance as the young Orson Welles.

Read the full review →
Variety
8 September 2008 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film agreeable and reasonably convincing, though it lacks energy and Zac Efron feels miscast. He singles out Christian McKay’s impersonation of Orson Welles as the film’s indisputable highlight.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 November 2009 · A. O. Scott
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 November 2009 · ★★★
60

The critic gives the film a three-star verdict. The review text is unavailable, so no specific praise or complaint can be identified.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 November 2009 · C · Nathan Rabin
57

Rabin finds the film a disappointing, bland coming-of-age story that only comes alive when Christian McKay takes center stage. He praises McKay’s charismatic, appropriately theatrical portrayal of Orson Welles, while criticizing the leads’ lack of chemistry and the film’s overdone performances.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 November 2009 · ★★/4 · Andrew Schenker
50

Schenker finds the film largely unenlightening and says Zac Efron is too bland to carry it. He praises the meticulously recreated period design and two inventive performance sequences, especially the opening-night Julius Caesar production.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 November 2009 · Betsy Sharkey
40*

Sharkey finds the film engaging in places but says it never quite recovers from Welles’ overpowering presence. She praises Christian McKay’s commanding performance and Claire Danes’ effortless acting, while criticizing Zac Efron’s underdeveloped role.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Adam Smith
40

The review is negative, saying the screenplay and direction ill-serve Zac Efron. It particularly criticizes how the film handles his performance as a teen star.

Read the full review →
Paste
14 December 2009 · Robert Davis
75*

Davis finds the film invigorating, though its young protagonist can feel passive and tiresome. He especially praises Christian McKay’s uncanny, magnetic portrayal of Orson Welles.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
26 November 2009
70*

The review finds the film an impressive, if slow-burning, change of pace for Zac Efron, with some muddled plotting and an unconvincing romance. It especially praises Christian McKay’s portrayal of Welles and Linklater’s detailed staging of the theater production.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate