Critics’ reviews

Menace II Society (1993)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 73: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Menace II Society

73
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics admire Menace II Society as a bleak, unsentimental debut from the Hughes brothers. The praise clusters on its honesty: reviewers repeatedly credit the film for showing young Black men in Watts without preaching, condescension or the redemptive turns of earlier ‘hood dramas, and for treating violence as something cyclical rather than something a speech can fix. The fast, documentary-flavoured style and the energy of the performances are singled out, and several reviews note how saccharine it makes its predecessors look. Later reassessments broadly agree with the reviews from 1993.

The reservations are about limits rather than failures. Empire finds stretches of it hard to follow beneath the lewd and violent surface, and more than one critic wonders whether unrelenting despair leaves the film anywhere to go. The spread is wide, from full marks to a single clear dismissal: The New Yorker calls the cynicism adolescent and the kinetic manner short on expressive range, while still crediting the film’s nerve in rejecting convention.

RogerEbert.com
26 May 1993 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film as a powerful, unsentimental portrait of a young Black man trapped by his environment and street values, noting its energy and strong performances while highlighting its unflinching look at inner-city violence without easy hope or blame on external racism alone.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 May 1993 · festival review · Leonard Klady
90*

The film is a grim, nihilistic, fierce, violent, and searing inner-city trip that marks a dynamic debut for the Hughes brothers. It suggests a bright future for the filmmakers despite its unrelenting tale.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2013 · Ian Nathan
80*

The Hughes brothers deliver a visceral, anti-violence message through a pseudo-documentary style that stands out in the ghetto genre. The film is undeniably affecting despite its lewd and violent content and occasional incomprehensibility.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 May 1993 · Peter Rainer
70*

The Hughes twins deliver a free-form 'hood drama that is best when it sets out its horrors without moralizing, making previous films seem saccharine by comparison. The young filmmakers' instincts allow an inside view of Watts gangbangers' violent generational attitudes.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 December 2021 · Derek Smith
70*

The critic praises the Hughes brothers' debut for its intuitive understanding of Los Angeles’s racial hierarchies and the persistence of violence and neglect in Watts. It presents a despairing, authentic portrait of a community at war with itself, rejecting redemptive clichés in favor of a cyclical view of tragedy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 June 1993 · Caryn James
70*

The film is praised for its radical bleakness and honesty in depicting disaffected young black men in Los Angeles without preaching or condescension. It offers an uncomfortable but valuable way to understand the characters' perspective on violence and despair.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
24 May 1993 · Terrence Rafferty
30*

The review describes the film as a speedy, violent, and adolescent-cynical take on no-hope lives, noting the directors' kinetic style suits the material but ultimately leaves it short on expressive options. It compares the film unfavorably to Buñuel's Los Olvidados while acknowledging its brave rejection of conventions.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate