Critics’ reviews

Midnight Express (1978)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 56: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Midnight Express

56
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics agree that Alan Parker directs with real force and that the prison itself is convincingly built: a closed, frightening world that several reviews say still holds up decades on. Brad Davis is praised almost everywhere, John Hurt more than once, and Oliver Stone’s screenplay has admirers for its raw momentum. Roughly half the reviews come down in the film’s favour.

The split is wide, and it turns on what the film asks us to feel. The reservations cluster on its portrayal of Turks as uniformly corrupt and sadistic, on how far it departs from Hayes’s own account, and on its readiness to let the audience enjoy the brutality while feeling only for the American at its centre. The New Yorker goes furthest, condemning it as xenophobic fantasy; Radio Times gives it full marks while conceding the same criticisms are valid. Empire admires it as exploitation and names its racism in the same breath.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Despite valid criticisms of its sympathetic portrayal of drug traffickers, violence and stereotypes, it remains a superbly staged drama that forces consideration of moral themes through its excesses. Directed with power by Alan Parker, it features outstanding performances especially from Brad Davis and John Hurt.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
70*

The critic calls Alan Parker's film a masterpiece of exploitation cinema that grips the audience through tension and sympathy for the lead. They single out Oliver Stone's bombastic script for praise while noting its misleading basis in fact, racism and gratuitous violence.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 February 2008 · B- · Keith Phipps
70

The film converts Hayes' story into an exploitative yet meditative prison drama that succeeds when focusing on the psychological toll but falters with its racist depictions of Turks as uniformly corrupt and sadistic. It features strong work from the cast and a notable synth score but is at war with itself in its handling of extreme material.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TR
60*

The film is a heavily fictionalised account of an American on a drug charge enduring hell in a Turkish jail. Performances lend some depth, but it prioritises clear-cut emotional impact over moral nuance and effectively panders to audience instincts as a thriller.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 October 1978 · Roger Ebert
50*

The critic praises director Alan Parker's creation of a fully realized prison world and its terror but objects to the film's eagerness to generate sympathy for the protagonist and its over-the-top indignation toward the Turks.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1977 · Variety Staff
50*

The review finds the cast, direction and production very good but faults the muddled, moralizing screenplay for its difficulty in sorting proper empathies and its Anglo-American hand-wringing over alien cultures.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 December 1978
30*

The piece criticizes the film for its relentless savaging of the audience through atrocities and grotesque tirades, noting its changeable morality that allows viewers to thrill to depravity without feeling compromised.

Read the full review →
The Times
22 June 2018 · ★★★★☆ · Ed Potton
30*

The critic describes Alan Parker’s film as one of the most disturbing — and problematic — re-creations of incarceration on film. It taps into the potent fear of losing liberty far from home.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
20 November 1978 · Pauline Kael
10*

The critic condemns the film as a mean-spirited, manipulative exercise in sadomasochistic and xenophobic fantasy that piles on horrors and dehumanizes Turks while sanctimoniously victimizing the protagonist.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 December 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises the film's enduring power as a hard-hitting account of incarceration, noting its authentic depiction and strong performances, particularly Brad Davis's. They single out the restraint in violence and lack of subtitles for authenticity.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
20 December 2011 · ★★★★ · Dave Roper
80

The review highlights the film's powerful indictment of brutality and corruption, commending Brad Davis's performance and Alan Parker's direction. It notes the harshness but finds it worthwhile for its message on justice.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate