Critics’ reviews

Mississippi Burning (1988)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 74: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Mississippi Burning

74
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond strongly to Mississippi Burning as a tense police drama that conveys the danger and racism of rural Mississippi. Praise centres on Gene Hackman, with Willem Dafoe and Frances McDormand also singled out, and on the film’s forceful pacing and convincing sense of place. The favourable reviews find its depiction of racial violence disturbing and dramatically effective, even when they question its handling of history.

The reservations concern whose story gets told and how far the fiction departs from the record. Several critics object to the sidelining of Black activism and the emphasis on white FBI agents, while others find the ending exaggerated or damaging to credibility. Seven of the eight reviews are positive, but the spread is wide. The New Yorker supplies the sole negative assessment, arguing that distorted facts, crude characterisation and mechanical effects overwhelm the effective scenes and performances.

RogerEbert.com
9 December 1988 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a gritty police drama about two FBI agents investigating the disappearance of civil rights workers that powerfully captures the passion and racism of 1964 rural Mississippi. Ebert singles out its authentic sense of time and place and the performances, especially Gene Hackman and Frances McDormand, for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 December 1988 · Vincent Canby
85*

The film is one of the toughest and most effective fiction films yet made about bigotry and racial violence. Canby praises its straight dramatization of the true story without pieties or subterfuges.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sue Heal
80

This powerful drama features mesmerising performances from Gene Hackman and Willem Dafoe as FBI agents fighting racism. It crackles with dramatic tension and is a gripping evocation of the early civil rights movement, shot with visual flair.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Barry McIlheney
75*

The critic finds the film superb cinema for its gripping pace, vivid evocation of the South, and strong performances by Hackman and Dafoe, despite noting that it prioritizes fiction and a white-savior narrative over historical accuracy.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 December 1988 · Sheila Benson
75*

The film moves viewers to outrage as fiction patterned on the 1964 murders and powerfully creates a sense of time and place thick with danger. Benson praises its cumulative power and catalogue of faces but notes omissions of black activism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
70*

Parker's film goes for the gut rather than the head in its assessment of Deep South racism. It praises Hackman's excellent performance and the director's controlled style without flashy tropes, while noting that Black characters are seen as mute victims and the ending falls into hyperbole.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1987
70*

The film captures much of the truth about the 1964 FBI probe into the murders despite a fanciful ending that undermines credibility. It notes the fervent pacing and strong cast but highlights the issue with the ending.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 December 1988 · Pauline Kael
40*

The film twists facts for garish violence and treats Southerners crudely while pounding the audience with mechanical effects. Kael criticizes its lack of sustaining sensibility despite some effective scenes and performances.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate