Critics’ reviews

Mona Lisa (1986)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 76: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Mona Lisa

76
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Time Out
10 September 2012 · RR
90*

The film is an assured London-set thriller about the need to love, triggered by Hoskins being assigned as chauffeur to an elegant prostitute played by Tyson. It delivers one of the most affecting love stories in recent cinema, with a slow descent towards hell and an extraordinarily touching performance from Hoskins at its heart.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 June 1986 · Sheila Benson
85*

The critic welcomes the film as a glorious, bittersweet adult diversion with controlled lyricism, strong humanism, and vivid storytelling centered on an unlikely romance amid London's underworld.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
80*

The critic praises Neil Jordan’s intelligent fusion of gangster thriller and love story set in Thatcher’s Britain, highlighting its exploration of class, race and sexuality. Bob Hoskins’ powerful performance as the downtrodden George is singled out as lifting the film into a Scorsese-like parable.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sue Heal
80

Hoskins conveys deeper emotion than usual as the gangster's chauffeur madly in love with Tyson's detached prostitute, bringing rich pathos to the plot. Jordan directs with great flair and insight, with Pratt's photography lingering in the mind, capturing 1980s soullessness in a moving and thought-provoking experience.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 July 1986 · Roger Ebert
80*

The critic praises Bob Hoskins' great performance as the ex-con George and the film's strong atmosphere and character work, noting the central relationship and supporting turns by Cathy Tyson and Michael Caine.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 April 2002 · Keith Phipps
80*

The critic notes that the film wraps complex themes of race, class, and identity in a brisk thriller. Bob Hoskins' performance stands out as the film's core, giving the story a redemptive glimmer amid its dark underworld.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 June 1986 · Pauline Kael
70*

The review pairs the film with Top Gun and focuses on its brutes and tone in the context of contemporary cinema.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 October 2021 · Derek Smith
60*

The early sections are praised for their off-kilter comedy, noir elements, and the chemistry between Hoskins and Tyson. The later thriller plot is criticized for becoming generic and regressive in its sexual politics.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 June 1986 · Vincent Canby
60*

The critic calls the film classy kitsch that is smooth and fun to watch for its performances and visuals but ultimately insubstantial and lacking in excitement as the story runs down.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
10 August 2012 · Jennie Kermode
75*

The critic praises the film's late twist that keeps viewers guessing, its gritty authenticity, and strong performances, particularly from Bob Hoskins and Michael Caine, while noting deeper themes of isolation and manipulation in a brutal world.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate