Critics’ reviews

Moonrise Kingdom (2012)

24 reviews from 24 publications. Critics’ score 78: 15 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Moonrise Kingdom

78
Positive
15
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Moonrise Kingdom, finding tenderness in Wes Anderson’s carefully arranged tale of young love. Praise centres on the young leads, whose sincerity makes the runaway romance convincing amid the elaborate sets and deadpan comedy. The reviews also admire the detailed visual compositions, with many finding that the storybook style strengthens the feeling rather than keeping it at a distance. The contrast between hopeful children and disappointed adults gives the humour a melancholy edge.

Reservations concern how much that style allows the audience to feel, and how well the later stretches hold together. Little White Lies finds the second half occasionally unfocused, while The Telegraph considers the ending messy. The spread is largely favourable rather than sharply divided, but Radio Times finds that Anderson’s mannerisms obstruct the pathos. Sight and Sound offers a milder dissent: the film pleases in the moment without leaving as lasting an impression as his earlier work.

Empire
1 March 2012 · Nev Pierce
85*

The critic praises the film's warm, beautiful world of first love and second chances, highlighting superb young performances and a sense of hope that makes it charming, daft, bright and joyful.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 May 2012 · festival review
85*

The critic celebrates the film's enchanting sweetness and deep feeling beneath its controlled surface, singling out its portrayal of intense, idyllic young love.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 May 2012 · Anthony Lane
85*

Anderson's film fuses the true and untrue in a tale of two children fleeing to the wild on a fictional island, redeemed by belonging and love amid adult disconnection. The critic singles out the new strain of tenderness and the moving performances, especially by Bill Murray and Bruce Willis.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
3 May 2012 · 4/4/4 · David Jenkins
80

The critic praises the film's sincere romanticism and hyper-detailed visual schemes while noting it occasionally loses focus in its second half.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 May 2012 · Betsy Sharkey
80*

Anderson finds near-perfect balance in this warm, funny fable about kids on the cusp of adolescence, with humanism and surrealism in harmony. The critic praises the magical spell cast by the story of young love and the way small truths emerge in the central relationship.

Read the full review →
The Independent
21 May 2012
80*

The critic calls it Anderson's most enjoyable film in a while, a fanciful summer excursion and children's film for arty kids that mixes American frontier spirit with European sensibility through its landscape and soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 May 2012 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The critic highlights the film's droll, cultured comedy and its smart balance of rarefied world-building with genuine feeling for its young heroes' romance.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
16 May 2012 · festival review · David Gritten
75*

The film marks a return for Anderson with young leads as 12-year-olds running away on a New England island in 1965. It is a worthy addition to his canon with deadpan wit and a generous view of human imperfections, though the ending feels messy.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
25 May 2012 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
70*

The reviewer takes time to warm to the choreographed quirkiness but finds the young leads engaging once the adventure begins, ultimately viewing the film as a perfect melancholic escape in Anderson's never-never land.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
17 May 2012 · festival review · Nick James
65*

The critic finds the film a pleasingly light and crowd-pleasing fantasia that appeals strongly in the moment but lacks lasting resonance compared to Anderson's earlier work.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Stella Papamichael
60

The critic notes the film's oddball humour and cerebral coming-of-age elements but finds Anderson's mannered style prevents the pathos from landing emotionally.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 May 2012 · Kristin M. Jones

The critic praises the film's piercing love story at its center and its rapt, spontaneous quality that lends an easy comic rhythm. She singles out the candlelit production of Britten’s opera Noye’s Fludde for its role in the film's magic and emphasis on love, friendship, and imagination.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
16 May 2012 · festival review · James Rocchi

The review calls it a tender triumph of design, decor, and rich emotion. It highlights Anderson's signature stylized world as enhancing the heartfelt story of young love.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 May 2012 · Roger Ebert

The film creates a magical, self-contained world on a New England island in 1965 where two children run away together for an adventure. Ebert praises its understated gravity, emotional depth, and the way it captures wistfulness and the passage of innocence without irony.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 May 2012 · Peter Bradshaw

Wes Anderson is on form with a charming tale about two unpopular kids who fall in love and run away. The film is a charming, beautifully wrought evocation of young love in a more innocent America, with elegance, formal brilliance and gentle comedy.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 May 2012 · festival review · Todd McCarthy

The critic describes it as a willfully eccentric pubescent love story with meticulous, dollhouse-like detail that will strike many as arch, but notes a stronger emotional undertow than some Anderson films. The bond between the young leads is singled out as strong and bracing amid the artificial style and pursuit plot.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 May 2012 · Critic's Pick · Manohla Dargis

Wes Anderson delivers a wondrous storybook tale about two 12-year-olds who run away to a remote cove, building their own world amid disappointed adults. The critic highlights the film's beauty, humor, deep melancholia, and how its artifice deepens emotional power.

Read the full review →
The Times
25 May 2012 · Kate Muir

Nostalgia-drenched Moonrise Kingdom is very funny and one of Anderson's best for fans, contrasting childish idealism with adult disillusion through great child actors and adult cameos. Sophistication comes from the cinematography and classical score.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
23 May 2012 · festival review · Anne-Katrin Titze
85*

The review praises the film's hermetic island universe, child actors' natural charm, and meticulous production design including costumes and sets. It calls it the perfect summer movie for the eternally twelve who like to travel in style.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 May 2012 · ★★★★ · Michael Leader
80

The review highlights the film's continuation of Anderson's exploration of childlike whimsy through the runaway romance of two 12-year-olds and finds warmth in the community's rally around the duo. It singles out the contrast between the director's meticulous formal style and the sincerity of young love and small-town life.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
25 May 2012 · ★★★★ · Ben Rawson-Jones
80

The critic calls the film an enchanting yet edgy romantic adventure that is visually delightful, frequently funny and consistently touching. He singles out the young leads' naturalistic performances and the intimate handheld camerawork in their scenes for capturing the essence of lonely children.

Read the full review →
/Film
25 May 2012 · 8/10 · Germain Lussier
80

The review highlights the film's sweet, uncynical tale of young love and innocence as a welcome evolution for Anderson. It notes strong visuals and humor but finds the idealistic nostalgia occasionally at odds with the director's usual style.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
23 May 2012 · ★★★★ · Adam Lowes
80

The review finds Moonrise Kingdom awash in Anderson's eccentric stylings yet grounded by emotional tenderness. It notes the film as his strongest and most satisfying since The Royal Tenenbaums, though enjoyment depends on tolerance for his whimsy.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
23 May 2012
80*

The critic finds the film engaging and deadpan-funny, firmly in Wes Anderson's comfort zone with its quirky style, though it may not win over detractors who find his work precious. It singles out the dry humor, eccentric characters, and visual comedy with inanimate objects for praise, while noting it lags in the third act compared to Fantastic Mr. Fox.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate