Critics’ reviews

My Fair Lady (1964)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 77: 9 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of My Fair Lady

77
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
2
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

This sumptuous adaptation won eight Oscars with superb performances from Harrison and Holloway. Hepburn is wonderful as Eliza despite not being coarse enough initially, and Cukor preserves the theatricality with elegance and taste to provide a joyful experience.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · empire
90*

The critic praises the film as wonderfully stylish, wittily scripted and immaculately cast. Audrey Hepburn's transformation is highlighted as a timeless, captivating classic.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 2006 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert finds the film a visual and verbal triumph that holds up beautifully, praising its literate screenplay, performances, and Cecil Beaton's designs while noting the legendary casting controversy around Audrey Hepburn versus Julie Andrews.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 October 2014 · Alistair Cooke
90*

The critic praises the film as a great one, highlighting Jack Warner, George Cukor’s direction that preserves the romanticism, Cecil Beaton’s designs, and especially Audrey Hepburn’s sensitive, poignant performance as Eliza that adds unexpected depth and pathos.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
21 October 2016 · James Powers
90*

The critic calls the film a fabulous musical that surpasses its stage origins as an exquisite and unique gem of filmmaking. They single out its breathtaking visual beauty in Technicolor, Cukor's crisp direction, and the witty, sentimental story with strong performances from Rex Harrison and Audrey Hepburn.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 October 1964 · Robert J. Landry
85*

Landry calls the film a stunning screen entertainment and Hollywood at its best, praising Rex Harrison and Cecil Beaton's designs as standout contributions along with the overall production values and direction by George Cukor.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
24 October 1964 · Brendan Gill
80*

Gill is surprised and delighted by how well the stage musical translates to screen, singling out Audrey Hepburn's fresh take on Eliza and Rex Harrison's even stronger Higgins performance.

Read the full review →
The Times
10 April 2004 · Stephen Dalton
80*

The review calls the 1964 film a sumptuous, best-loved screen musical and praises the special edition’s visual quality from digital restoration along with its witty, infectious tunes and charming cast including Rex Harrison and Audrey Hepburn.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
30*

Cukor directs with tact and care for the source material but with unnecessary circumspection and a steady pace that inhibits the film. Rex Harrison's definitive Higgins stands out amid sumptuous but flat decor and Hepburn's limitations as the guttersnipe Eliza.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
30*

Cukor transfers the musical effectively to the screen with sumptuously impressive sets, costumes, photography and choreography, and Harrison makes a fine arrogant Higgins. Hepburn is awkward as the Cockney Eliza in the first half and the adaptation is a little too reverential to really come alive.

Read the full review →
Collider
28 May 2021 · Matt Goldberg
85*

The critic praises the film's lavish production values and enduring appeal as a classic Hollywood musical, highlighting the strong performances and memorable songs. The review singles out the meticulous sets and costumes for particular admiration in the context of the new transfer.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate