Critics’ reviews

Napoleon (2023)

27 reviews from 27 publications. Critics’ score 70: 15 positive, 6 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Napoleon

70
Positive
15
Mixed
6
Negative
3

Most critics come down on Napoleon’s side, though not by much, and the spread is wide: full marks at one end, outright dismissal at the other. The praise gathers in two places. The battle sequences, Austerlitz and Waterloo in particular, are called coherent, brutal and clear even by reviewers who dislike the rest. And the marriage holds the film together for many: Joaquin Phoenix’s petulant, faintly comic Napoleon and Vanessa Kirby’s Josephine are singled out again and again, with several critics naming Kirby the real lead. The reservations cluster around purpose. Time Out and The Ringer find no clear point of view; /Film calls the theatrical cut rushed and hopes for a longer version; the Los Angeles Times sees no coherent purpose and The Wrap an unsettled tone. Vulture rejects it outright, finding it a drag with no animating idea, while Variety judges the domestic scenes a distraction from the war. Even the doubters tend to grant Scott the battles.

The Guardian
15 November 2023 · ★★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
100

Ridley Scott has created an outrageously enjoyable full-tilt biopic that dispenses with symbolic weight in favour of spectacle centred on Joaquin Phoenix's magnificent performance as Napoleon. The critic singles out Phoenix's satiric, preening portrayal of the military genius and power couple dynamic with Vanessa Kirby's Josephine for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 November 2023 · B+ · Brent Simon
83

The critic praises it as a dynamite biopic with a compelling psychological portrait, highlighting the interplay between battlefield successes and domestic struggles with Josephine.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
14 November 2023 · Danny Leigh
80*

Ridley Scott brings his A game to a gripping, often delightfully lairy slab of pop history made with mischief, flash and meticulous craft, emerging as a tale of war, power and brisk postprandial sex. The critic singles out the brash and swaggering but oddly grown-up tone and the director's comparison of visions with Napoleon.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
15 November 2023 · 3/4/4 · Hannah Strong
80

Scott delivers a brash, thrilling and blood-soaked epic focused on Napoleon’s obsessions with power and Josephine. The film excels in its brutal battle sequences and complex central relationship but glosses over some historical episodes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
21 November 2023 · ★★★★
80

Ridley Scott’s high-budget historical epic is a perfect match for his talents, delivering coherent battle scenes and a strong lead performance from Joaquin Phoenix. The film balances spectacle with character contradictions and witty supporting turns.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 November 2023
80*

Scott presents Napoleon as an immutable force of nature driven by fragile ego, with Phoenix’s thorny performance highlighting his flaws and insecurities. Exceptional battle scenes and the central romance make for a lavish, thoughtful drama that remains entranced by its subject.

Read the full review →
The Times
26 November 2023 · ★★★★ · Tom Shone
80

The film delivers one whopping epic sight after another in spectacular battle scenes, but what stands out most is the tempestuous romance between Napoleon and Josephine, with Vanessa Kirby bewitching as the real star. The critic praises Kirby's performance and the satirical edge away from the battlefield.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
16 November 2023
75*

The critic finds Ridley Scott’s biopic eminently watchable thanks to spectacular set pieces and bedchamber melodrama, despite an academic approach to the subject. Phoenix and Kirby’s performances humanise the central couple amid the grand battle recreations.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
27 November 2023 · Mark Asch
70*

The critic finds the film weirder than expected, with Phoenix delivering a funny, contemporary performance of an insecure Napoleon focused on his relationship with Joséphine, making it a perversely entertaining portrait despite weak historiography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
14 November 2023 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60

Scott’s epic looks impressive but lacks flavour and a clear point of view, prioritising battles over deeper character insight. Phoenix and Kirby shine in the central relationship, though the film feels like a history lesson without enough story.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 November 2023 · Peter Debruge
50*

The review calls the film a bloated take that ricochets between battlefield and bedroom, with Phoenix’s anti-charismatic performance and the focus on Josephine distracting from the epic war footage. Scott’s staging of battles is praised as a highlight amid the uneven execution.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 November 2023 · Justin Chang
40*

The critic describes the film as a lavish but threadbare epic that punctures Napoleon’s mystique through comic rage and carnage, yet lacks coherent purpose or deeper insight. Vanessa Kirby’s mesmerizing performance as Joséphine is highlighted as holding the movie together.

Read the full review →
Vulture
22 November 2023
30*

The critic finds the film not good overall and a turgid drag with faltering rhythms. Phoenix's weird, buffoonish performance is singled out as the one memorable element amid the lack of an animating idea.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 November 2023 · Catherine Bray

The film is an entertaining and plausible interpretation of Napoleon as a micromanager who gets his kicks from wars and sex, with a deadpan, idiosyncratic tone that undercuts traditional historical epics. Scott presents a funny close-up of the man rather than a broader account of his life.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 November 2023 · David Rooney

The critic finds the film more ambitious than involving overall. Phoenix and Kirby's central performances and chemistry are singled out as the most alive elements amid the sprawling, narratively sludgy epic.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 November 2023 · Critic’s Pick · Manohla Dargis

The critic finds the film consistently surprising for its refusal to conform to epic conventions and its unromanticized portrait of Napoleon as a petulant, vain figure. Joaquin Phoenix’s mesmerizing, lumpish performance is singled out as the standout element.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
15 November 2023 · ★★★★★ · Linda Marric
100

Ridley Scott delivers one of his best films since Gladiator with a precise, masterfully acted epic that knows its audience. It is genuinely thrilling and the very definition of a must-see film, with strong performances across the board.

Read the full review →
Collider
14 November 2023 · B+ · Ross Bonaime
83

The critic praises the film's monumental scale and grandiosity under Ridley Scott's direction, along with commanding performances by Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby that make the compressed historical narrative engrossing and frequently hilarious.

Read the full review →
Deadline
14 November 2023 · Damon Wise
80*

The critic finds Ridley Scott's biopic a psychologically complex but brilliantly staged epic that succeeds thanks to Joaquin Phoenix's charismatic lead performance as a master of war. The battle sequences, especially Austerlitz and Waterloo, are singled out for their visceral, visually striking execution.

Read the full review →
NME
23 November 2023 · ★★★★ · Lou Thomas
80

The review calls it an unmissable historical epic with terrific battle scenes and strong performances, especially Phoenix's, recommending it despite historical inaccuracies.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
15 November 2023 · B · Simon Thompson
77

The critic praises the film's visceral and graphic battle sequences as phenomenal and overwhelming, along with the strong performances from Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby in their toxic, co-dependent relationship. It is called an epic crowd-pleaser and Ridley Scott's best work since The Martian.

Read the full review →
Polygon
21 November 2023 · Joshua Rivera
75*

The critic describes the film as an anti-Great Man biopic that uses Napoleon's tumultuous marriage to Joséphine to explore masculine insecurity and its violent consequences. It praises the meticulously rendered battles and the focused, subversive portrayal of the central relationship.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
21 November 2023 · James Harvey
65*

Scott views Napoleon with a mix of awe and scorn, portraying him as an emotionally stunted man-child in a cold, clinically observed biopic. The film excels in its spectacular battle sequences while undermining the 'great man' myth with a focus on his volatile, unerotic relationship with Josephine.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
15 November 2023 · ★★★ · David Crow
60

The critic sees the film as an unexpected comedy delight satirizing Napoleon through his odd romance with Joséphine, praising the performances of Phoenix and Kirby and Scott's epic filmmaking, while noting it may not appeal to French audiences.

Read the full review →
/Film
14 November 2023 · 6/10 · Chris Evangelista
60

The review finds the theatrical cut rushed and surface-level, like a CliffsNotes version that fails to fully explore Napoleon's character or rise to power, though it stages battles masterfully and benefits from Vanessa Kirby's strong performance as Joséphine. The critic looks forward to a longer director's cut.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
21 November 2023 · Adam Nayman
55*

The review sees the film as an ambitious but uneven triple mix of blockbuster action, tragic romance, and great-man deconstruction that lacks overall clarity and commitment. It singles out the battle sequences for their impressive scale and visceral impact while faulting the satirical and emotional elements.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
15 November 2023
40*

The critic finds the epic dry and unintentionally funny overall, with Phoenix unable to settle on a consistent tone between immaturity and leadership, though battle scenes deliver spectacle.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate