Critics’ reviews

Never Say Never Again (1983)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 65: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Never Say Never Again

65
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics give Never Say Never Again a moderately warm welcome, and nearly all of them locate the reason in the cast. Sean Connery’s return is the main event: the reviews find him more human than before, older and easier in the part, playing it with an irony they enjoy. Klaus Maria Brandauer’s Largo is singled out repeatedly as one of the better villains in the series, and the henchwoman Fatima Blush draws similar praise. Several critics also credit Irvin Kershner’s direction with more humour and character than these films usually manage.

The reservations fall on the script. The story is a retread of Thunderball, and more than one reviewer finds it flabby and cutesy, with Domino a weak part. The spread is fairly wide: The AV Club sees a screenplay that treats its material with thinly veiled contempt, and Empire goes further, suggesting Connery was wise to have quit the first time.

Time Out
10 September 2012 · CPea
75*

The critic finds it comforting to return to the classic Bond atmosphere of gratuitous sex and violence. They single out the strong cast of villains and especially Sean Connery's welcome return in the lead role as the film's real highlight.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 October 1983 · Roger Ebert
70*

The critic welcomes Connery's return as a more human Bond and highlights the emotional depth brought by Klaus Maria Brandauer's performance as the villain Largo.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 October 1983 · Janet Maslin
70*

This is the better Bond film of the season, with noticeably more humor and character than usual, thanks to Kershner's direction and a marvelous villain in Largo.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1982 · Variety Staff
70*

The film benefits from strong casting, with Brandauer as one of the best Bond opponents, Carrera and Basinger in key roles, and Connery in fine form.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
1 April 2009 · C+ · Noel Murray
63

The critic finds it a flabby, cutesy Bond picture that derives most of its value from its cast, especially Connery's portrayal of an aging Bond. The screenplay is kitschy and treats the material with thinly veiled contempt, though the film remains too agreeable to dislike.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
40*

The critic notes that Connery returns to the role with a pleasing sense of irony in this Thunderball retread involving SPECTRE and nuclear weapons. He concludes that Connery was perhaps wise to have quit the first time round.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 October 2019 · Max Williams
70*

The critic finds the film a pleasantly surprising, sly and witty semi-pastiche that holds its own with other Bond entries, praising Connery's energetic performance and standout villain Fatima Blush, while noting some narrative weaknesses and the weak Domino character.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate