
Most critics respond warmly to Nocturnal Animals, praising Tom Ford’s control of its interwoven stories and the tension of the violent thriller within them. The photography and carefully composed images draw broad approval, while Amy Adams and Jake Gyllenhaal receive frequent praise for giving the material emotional weight. Michael Shannon and Aaron Taylor-Johnson also stand out across the reviews. Admirers find the shifts between polished interiors and threatening Texas landscapes gripping rather than merely decorative.
The spread is wide, however, and the main disagreement concerns how much the film has to say beneath its style. Even favourable reviews question the obvious symbolism, strained parallels and thin art-world satire. Some find a persuasive study of regret and vengeance; others find little psychological depth. Time Out objects to its cruelty and cynicism, while The Skinny identifies misogyny in its treatment of women. These dissenters challenge the film’s outlook, not simply its storytelling.
G
The Guardian
2 September 2016 · festival review · Peter Bradshaw
90*
Superb second feature from the director, a pitch-black thriller with a gripping double-stranded narrative that makes you care about both stories equally. It combines melodrama with teasing sophistication and has a vodka-kick of pure malice.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
2 September 2016 · festival review · David Rooney
90*
The critic praises Ford's assured direction and the film's seamless interweaving of three narrative strands into a gripping noir melodrama. Amy Adams's nuanced central performance and the impeccable ensemble are singled out as highlights of this stylish stunner.
Read the full review →V
Variety
2 September 2016 · festival review
90*
Tom Ford’s ambitious high-wire noir thriller draws lurid elements from pulp and noir with splendid performances from Adams and Gyllenhaal. It seizes and holds with its suspense and vision, leaving no doubt as to Ford’s fervor and originality as a director.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
4 November 2016 · David Sexton
85*
Tom Ford brilliantly converts the complex literary thriller into pure cinema with clarity, beauty of imagery and emotional ferocity. The Texas section rivals the Coen brothers at their best, with fine performances especially from Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Shannon.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
17 November 2016 · B+ · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
83
The critic commends the film's elegant postmodern layering of stories and its tight control compared to Ford's debut. Strong ensemble work, particularly Aaron Taylor-Johnson, is noted alongside the sensualist aesthetic approach.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
3 November 2016 · Nigel Andrews
80*
Designer turned director Tom Ford’s second movie is nightmarishly good and pretty damn good overall. At its best and most visceral it is more than the work of an apprentice or homage payer.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
3 November 2016 · ★★★★ · Matthew Turner
80
The stylish and sophisticated thriller skilfully blends fact and fiction to mesmerising effect. It features captivating performances from Amy Adams and Jake Gyllenhaal, strong support from the cast, and a haunting atmosphere created by striking camerawork.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
3 November 2016 · ★★★★ · Robbie Collin
80
Elegantly ludicrous and ludicrously enjoyable new film from Tom Ford with a dual structure that is intoxicating, provocative and delicious. Adams gives a brittle resilience in regular exquisite close-ups.
Read the full review →E
Empire
31 October 2016 · Will Lawrence
75*
The critic praises Tom Ford's direction for its exquisite visuals and adept handling of the dual narratives, calling the transitions wonderfully adept. The cast is impressive and the film is seen as a masterfully formed piece of junk culture with an unapologetic pulp filling.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
14 November 2016 · ★★★/4 · Jesse Cataldo
75
The review notes the film's ambitious attempt to blend pulp thriller and melodrama while commenting on class and cultural divides. It praises striking moments that mix ugliness and artistry but faults a lack of focus that leaves it tantalizingly close to greatness.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
2 September 2016 · festival review · Ben Croll
70*
The review highlights Ford's ambitious leap into more complex territory with a striking two-hander structure. It singles out the film's bold tonal shifts and strong performances for praise in this festival context.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
17 November 2016 · Justin Chang
70*
Tom Ford’s meta-thriller weaves three stories with an intensity of human feeling that cuts through its slick style. It delivers a corrosively beautiful cocktail of a thriller that balances visual command with emotional depth, though some parallels between narratives feel overplayed.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
2 September 2016 · festival review
70*
The review praises Ford's stylish adaptation and effective thriller elements, noting it remains highly effective despite some over-statement.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
18 November 2016 · Manohla Dargis
70*
The film is a harsh cautionary tale about love, vengeance and the divide between life and art. It explores how real people are turned into fictional characters and old hurts made into narrative grist, with smooth transitions between Susan’s story and the novel’s violent plot.
Read the full review →T
The Times
4 November 2016 · ★★★★☆ · Kate Muir
70*
Tom Ford’s second movie is a psychological thriller that drives deep into violent redneck territory and is tense and stylish. It is about the revenge of the true artist on the greedy charlatan and of a spurned husband on his former wife.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
25 September 2016 · festival review · Simran Hans
50*
The critic finds the film mixed, praising its visual style and ability to capture the experience of reading but criticizing its inconsistent tone and lack of emotional depth in the thriller strand.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
17 November 2016 · Anthony Lane
50*
The film offers two stories for the price of one: Susan’s empty Los Angeles life and the violent Texas tale in her ex-husband’s novel. Neither section is especially compelling on its own—the L.A. lampoon feels thin while the Texas scenes are a stylized dream of violence.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
· Genevieve Yue
40*
The critic finds Tom Ford’s second feature airless and inconclusive in exploring the relationship between life and art. It collapses under clichés and offers little insight despite moments of permeability between the nested narratives.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
1 November 2016 · Dave Calhoun
30*
The review criticizes the film for being cruel, cynical, and failing to explore psychological complexities, despite strong photography.
Read the full review →C
Collider
16 November 2016 · A- · Matt Goldberg
90
The critic praises the film as a haunting examination of characters trapped by their pasts and narratives, with standout performances especially from Amy Adams. Ford effectively turns a revenge story into a reflection on regret and bitterness.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
14 November 2016 · Pete Hammond
80*
The critic finds Tom Ford's second feature a worthy follow-up to his debut, proving it was no fluke with its stylish mix of genres and strong performances. He singles out the excellent acting across the board, particularly Michael Shannon and Aaron Taylor-Johnson.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
3 November 2016 · ★★★★ · Elizabeth Donoghue
80
The critic praises the film as engrossing and stylish, with strong performances especially from Jake Gyllenhaal and Aaron Taylor-Johnson in the harrowing central sequences. It is an assault on the senses that ultimately earns her affection despite some unsubtle symbolism.
Read the full review →The critic concludes that Ford gambles big with his sophomore effort and wins, successfully melding two very different narrative threads into a film that packs a real punch. He singles out Aaron Taylor-Johnson's standout creepy performance as the ringleader in the novel-within-the-film sequences.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
2 September 2016 · B · Jessica Kiang
77
The film is a feast for the eyes and highly enjoyable as a bifurcated meta-story and gritty pulp thriller-within-a-thriller, especially thanks to Michael Shannon, but Ford's attempt to add depth and consequence falls short and leaves the whole feeling inconsequential.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
2 September 2016 · festival review · Jo-Ann Titmarsh
75*
The film is a finely crafted, visually sumptuous tale of loss and revenge that blends Susan's present-day life with her ex-husband's novel. It features strong performances, especially from Michael Shannon, and appeals to a broader audience than Ford's debut despite some predictability in the story-within-a-story.
Read the full review →/
/Film
18 November 2016 · 7/10 · Angie Han
70
There's much to admire in the beautifully braided dual narratives and strong performances from Adams and Gyllenhaal, along with Ford's precise and lovely visuals. However, the film aims for profundity on themes of vengeance and love but falls short, feeling pretty but hollow.
Read the full review →N
NME
3 November 2016 · 4 · Nick Levine
70*
The critic calls it a gripping and remarkably accomplished piece of storytelling that keeps its competing narratives streamlined. Amy Adams anchors the film with a sensitive performance, though a provocative opening sequence jars slightly.
Read the full review →P
Paste
18 November 2016 · 8.0 · Brogan Morris
70*
Ford delivers a stylish yet substantial thriller that explores toxic masculinity and personal anxieties through dual narratives, with gripping pulp sequences contrasting the hollow real world. It’s a personal, haunting film despite some overstuffing.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
26 October 2016 · Owen Van Spall
60*
Ford's stylish revenge thriller looks gorgeous but over-eggs the satirical tone in Susan's art-world scenes, creating an unsettling study of bitter people hurting each other through fiction. The gripping inner thriller strand, elevated by Michael Shannon, contrasts with the more pulpy and manipulative outer narrative.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
21 November 2016 · K. Austin Collins
40*
The film falters in reaching for deeper insight beyond style, which Ford excels at but ultimately isn't enough, as it highlights the hollowness of its characters and the director's own preoccupations. Strong details like hair and wardrobe provide sociological insight into the characters.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
4 November 2016 · ★★ · Rachel Ashenden
40
The critic finds the film gorgeous but ultimately troubled by ugly misogyny that surfaces in its allegory of rape and murder. While it captures the escapism of reading effectively, the denouement reduces it to a conservative morality tale.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate