Most critics take this as Soderbergh setting out to have fun and succeeding. The praise clusters on two things: the direction, described again and again as slick, effortless and light on its feet, and the cast, whose quick-fire interplay several reviewers rate above the heist mechanics themselves. Pitt is singled out more than once; Variety gives particular credit to the older pros, Reiner and Gould. The jazzy score and the camerawork get approving mentions, and The Guardian rates it a marked improvement on the 1960 original. The spread is narrow, with the reviews settling in the upper range. Reservations are about weight rather than execution: several call it surfaces and grace notes, fun without much underneath. The one clear dissent comes from The New Yorker, which finds it great fun for an hour and then shallow, with no real climax, and calls it Soderbergh’s least adventurous work. Screen Daily is cooler too, finding it only sporadically entertaining.
Soderbergh opts for fun over substance with this slick, cool heist remake; it's packed with charisma, great direction, and entertainment value, though not his most substantial work.
Read the full review →