The reviews split almost down the middle, and the disagreement is about whether a return to Las Vegas is a relief or a retreat. Those in favour find the third film breezier and better plotted than its predecessor, and they praise Soderbergh’s polished direction, the glossy camerawork, the intricacy of the cons and the ensemble’s relaxed cool, with Clooney and Pacino picked out by name. The reservations cluster on familiarity: several critics say it plays as a remake of the first film, with thinner characters, a wafer-thin role for Pacino and a fondness for its own stars that curdles into smugness. The negative end is sharp. The Guardian calls it empty and self-congratulatory and objects to the treatment of its one female character, while Slant Magazine finds the vignettes disconnected and the factory strike subplot offensive. Radio Times thinks the cast looks disengaged, Ellen Barkin apart. The spread runs the full width of the scale.
The film recaptures the breezy cool of the first entry by returning to Vegas, with stylish direction, strong production values, and an ideal Pacino as the nemesis. It delivers ultra-cool cons and keeps the series' fizz alive without missing a beat.
Read the full review →