Critics’ reviews

Of Time and the City (2008)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 81: 10 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Of Time and the City

81
Positive
10
Mixed
1
Negative
1

The reviews lean strongly in the film’s favour. Most critics describe Davies’s return as a poetic, deeply personal essay on Liverpool, and the praise clusters in the same place: the archive footage, chosen with evident care, and the way it is set against music and Davies’s own narration. Several reviews call the juxtapositions rapturous or intoxicating, and most find the voice-over witty as well as mournful. Even the dissenters concede the film is beautifully assembled.

Where they part is on Davies himself. His anger at what became of the city strikes some as a strength and others as grating; the Los Angeles Times finds it occasionally overwrought, and Eye for Film, the one outright negative review, dislikes the sour, cynical tone enough to turn against the film. Variety finds it charming but not especially profound about Liverpool itself, and The AV Club thinks the sterile digital photography breaks the spell. The spread is narrow, with one clear outlier.

Time Out
19 May 2008 · ★★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
100

The review calls the film an enthralling, poetic docu-essay, while noting its caustic streak. It singles out the distinctive mix of music and literary voices.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 September 2008 · Ian Freer
95*

The critic calls it a poignant, beautiful and entrancing film, praising Davies’ personal yet universal portrait of Liverpool. The review singles out the carefully chosen archive footage, varied soundtrack and narration.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 October 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
95*

Bradshaw calls the film sublime and a welcome comeback for Davies. He especially praises the rapturous, often brilliantly wrong juxtapositions of archival images, music and narration.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 January 2009 · A.O. Scott
90*

The critic gives the film a strongly positive verdict. The film’s lyrical, personal treatment of Liverpool’s past is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
10 June 2008 · festival review · James Crawford
85*

Crawford finds the film intoxicating and deeply personal, praising Davies’s poetic, seductive voice and intelligence. He notes that the Korean War montage’s sentimental song choice is a rare misstep.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 January 2009 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan finds the film a distinct pleasure, despite moments when Davies’s anger feels grating and overwrought. He especially praises Davies’s eye for evocative archival footage and his skillful pairing of images with music.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 January 2009 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83

Tobias describes the film as a caustic, witty, regretful elegy that offers a distinctive portrait of Liverpool. He praises Davies’ personal perspective and narration, while noting that the sterile digital photography breaks the spell.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
80*

The critic offers an affectionate, amused and sometimes angry portrait of Davies’s Liverpool. They praise the deft use of archival footage, witty commentary, literary quotations and apt music.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 January 2009 · ★★★/4 · Fernando F. Croce
75

Croce finds the film emotionally powerful, though its mix of rue, anger, and elation only occasionally becomes rhapsodic. He praises its layered archival images and melodic passages, which make the vanished world of Davies’s childhood feel vividly present.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
75*

The critic finds the documentary a poignant celebration and mourning of Liverpool. They praise how Davies’s voice-over and musical selections animate archival footage through inventive montage.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 May 2008 · festival review · Leslie Felperin
65*

Felperin finds the film moving, droll and charming, though not especially profound and sometimes short on insight about Liverpool itself. She praises its polished editing, musical choices, Davies’s narration and especially its archival research.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 October 2008 · Val Kermode
30*

Kermode finds the film beautifully made and haunting, but ultimately dislikes its sour, cynical tone. She especially praises the archive footage and moments when music and images combine without Davies’s narration.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate