Critics’ reviews

Once Upon a Time in America (1984)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 78: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Once Upon a Time in America

78
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
2
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

Leone's final film is an extraordinary, massive-scale crime drama chronicling two New York gangsters across four decades in flashback. The critic praises the immaculate period reconstruction, Ennio Morricone score and epic sweep while noting the arbitrary plotting and shocking content.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1984 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

Ebert praises the full 227-minute version as an epic poem of violence and greed with complex, compelling flashbacks and emotional depth. He singles out the poetic structure and recurring motifs like the ringing telephone for praise while condemning the shortened U.S. theatrical cut as a travesty.

Read the full review →
The Times
5 April 2019 · ★★★★★ · Ed Potton
100

The critic praises Leone's ambitious final film as a sweeping story of friendship and betrayal spanning decades, noting its strong performances by De Niro and Woods along with Morricone's score.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
85*

The critic argues that Leone's film surpasses The Godfather by favoring ambiguity and symbolism over melodrama, exploring themes of time, identity, and memory with masterful visuals. It resists easy interpretation, leaving a profound mystery that lingers in the mind.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 June 2003 · Keith Phipps
80*

The film succeeds brilliantly as epic poetry despite barely working as a gangster film. It combines theatrical gangsters, Western-honed style, and deep melancholy in a grand-scale work of ambiguities and oversized passions.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 February 2015 · CPea
80*

Leone's vision retains magnificent sweep in this epic of friendship, betrayal, love and death among the Jewish Mafia. The film subsides to a sombre, elegiac emotional core centred on a man bent and broken by time.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 May 1985 · Pauline Kael
75*

Kael finds the full version a vast improvement over the butchered cut, with a dreamy obsessiveness and Robert De Niro's performance taking hold. She praises the reverberant dreamland settings and Leone’s majestic sense of film movement while noting the plot's shakiness and miscasting.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 November 2012 · Steve Macfarlane
65*

As a magnum opus it falls just a few points shy of greatness, remaining a basic Italian melodrama despite its lush details and mood. Leone's introspective scenes reveal weaknesses with overly choreographed maneuvers and soapy music.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 June 1984 · Vincent Canby
40*

Canby describes the film as a lazily hallucinatory epic attempting to encapsulate 50 years of American social history. He notes the coherent early Brooklyn prologue but criticizes the overall restlessness and lack of focus in the sprawling narrative.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1983 · festival review
35*

The review calls the sprawling saga a disappointment deficient in clarity, purpose, excitement, and narrative involvement. It notes effective poetic echoes from the time-jumping structure but criticizes the arbitrary feel and unpalatable central character.

Read the full review →
Collider
18 October 2022 · A- · William Fischer
90

The critic praises the film's ambitious nonlinear structure, epic scale, and technical mastery but finds the central characters unsympathetic run-of-the-mill thugs whose story feels mismatched to their limited depth.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 September 2021 · Tony Sokol
90*

The critic calls the film a gangster masterpiece on par with The Godfather, praising its epic scope, unflinching portrayal of crime and betrayal, and the iconic performances by Robert De Niro and James Woods.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate