Critics’ reviews

One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 75: 9 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of One Hundred and One Dalmatians

75
Positive
9
Mixed
2
Negative
1
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Andrew Collins
100

The review describes it as a hardy perennial from Disney with deft mix of cute animals and foolish humans. It singles out the draughtsmanship and personalities of the dalmatians plus the poignant twilight bark sequence.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
90*

The critic calls the film one of Disney's finest and most underrated, praising its witty, scary, beautifully paced and brilliantly animated qualities as the timeless Disney formula at its best.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 July 1991 · Charles Solomon
90*

Thirty years after release, the 1961 Disney film remains fresh, funny and thoroughly entertaining in re-release, with a clean simplified design reflecting early '60s graphics. Cruella de Vil is genuinely menacing and outrageously funny as the first of Disney's comic villainesses.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 March 2008 · Eric Henderson
90*

The critic praises the film as one of Disney's best for its compelling take on family and aesthetics, highlighting Cruella De Vil as a tour-de-force villain who embodies fashion-as-death with her striking design, voice, and menace. The review singles out the gritty Xerox animation process and Cruella's mundane yet terminal evil for praise while noting the film's embrace of destructiveness.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 March 2014 · RP
80*

The critic calls the film brilliant entertainment and Disney at his finest. It highlights the voice-over narration by Pongo and the mix of thematic concerns around the dognapping plot.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
70*

The review praises the film's discretion in handling sentimental material and the engaging plot from the kidnapping onwards. It singles out the lovingly detailed backgrounds and the distinct, engaging personalities of the dogs for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 February 1961 · Howard Thompson
70*

Walt Disney's latest animated feature spins a cozy and sentimental yarn about Dalmatians threatened by a dognapping villainess, with the dogs proving cute and friendly. The film should appeal especially to younger children despite the menacing female antagonist.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1960
70*

The painstaking creative effort is not as indelibly enchanting as some prior Disney animated films but should amuse even hardened adults with several passages in its story of puppies rescued from Cruella De Vil. The canine sleuthing network is a highlight of the London-set yarn.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 July 1991 · Roger Ebert
65*

The 1961 Disney animated film is an uneven but passable family entertainment in its 1991 re-release, with moments of inspiration amid a conventional kidnapping-and-rescue tale. It is not among the studio's greatest classics, but the character of Cruella De Vil stands out as first-rate.

Read the full review →
The Times
1 March 2008 · Louise Cohen
65*

The 1961 Disney animated feature is beautiful though it lacks the cosy fantasy of earlier classics. The bonus disc of extras on this DVD re-release makes it worth revisiting, with details on animation techniques and historical context.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
11 March 1961 · Edith Oliver
30*

Disney's full-length cartoon contains ingenious ideas but suffers from the studio head's focus on both kids and the box office, resulting in more failures than successes. The story of Cruella kidnapping puppies for a fur coat is ultimately uncomfortable rather than fully engaging.

Read the full review →
Polygon
25 April 2023 · Susana Polo
90*

The critic celebrates the film as brilliant despite Walt Disney's personal dislike of its style, highlighting its role in saving Disney animation and its modern, relatable approach. She singles out its realistic contemporary setting and innovative production techniques for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate