Critics’ reviews

Page Eight (2011)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 72: 6 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Page Eight

72
Positive
6
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics like Page Eight, and the praise gathers in two places: Bill Nighy and David Hare’s dialogue. The warmer reviews call it a classy, intelligent spy drama, led by character rather than chases, and nearly all of them note how well the cast handles Hare’s clipped, witty lines. Nighy’s performance is the single most praised element, with Rachel Weisz, Ralph Fiennes and Michael Gambon mentioned alongside him, and the scenes between Nighy and Gambon singled out more than once.

The reservations are about pace and payoff. Variety finds it short on urgency and thinks The Ghost Writer did this better. The AV Club enjoys the film but finds the ending anticlimactic, and Den of Geek calls it stylish yet emotionally sterile, with a weakly drawn Israel-Palestine subplot. Time Out, while approving, finds Hare’s writing mannered. The lone negative, Eye for Film, calls it undercooked and episodic while still admiring the cast. The spread is fairly narrow: mild approval to warm, with one outlier.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · festival review · Nick Roddick
90*

Roddick calls the film an enthralling, intelligent political thriller and a standout exposé of British establishment power. He especially praises Bill Nighy’s deeply moving performance and David Hare’s sharp, funny dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 September 2011 · Phil Hogan
90*

Hogan considers Page Eight an effortlessly good, classy spy drama and hopes its protagonist will return. He singles out the performances of Bill Nighy and Rachel Weisz, alongside the film’s lean dialogue and measured storytelling.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 November 2011 · Robert Lloyd
85*

Lloyd finds the thriller a rewarding, character-focused drama with sharp political themes. He especially praises Bill Nighy’s performance, the ensemble cast, and David Hare’s precise dialogue.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 August 2011 · ★★★★ · Gabriel Tate
80

The review finds David Hare’s writing both pithily inspired and frustratingly mannered. It singles out the screenplay’s writing for praise, while noting its mannered side.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 November 2011 · Meredith Blake
70*

Blake finds the film an engaging, intimate take on espionage, though its conclusion feels inadequate and anticlimactic. She praises David Hare’s concise, witty writing and the cast’s delivery.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 June 2011 · festival review · Charles Gant
65*

Gant finds it an enjoyable, polished spy drama but says it lacks urgency and compares unfavorably with The Ghost Writer. He praises the cast’s delivery of the pithy dialogue.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
17 June 2011 · Allan Hunter
64*

The review’s verdict is unavailable because the article is paywalled. Its praise or complaint cannot be determined from the visible text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 November 2011
64*

The page appears to be a review of Page Eight, but its verdict cannot be assessed from the inaccessible text. No praise or complaint is available to identify.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
29 June 2011 · ★★★★ · Steven Neish
80

The review finds the film thoroughly enjoyable and engaging, despite its low-key thrills and uneven writing. It praises the chemistry and witty exchanges between Bill Nighy and Michael Gambon.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
28 August 2011 · Louisa Mellor
65*

The review finds Page Eight cerebral and stylish, but emotionally sterile, while still calling it a treat for television. It praises Bill Nighy’s droll performance and the sharp dialogue, while faulting the Israel-Palestine subplot as weakly drawn.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
14 September 2011 · festival review
64*

The URL identifies this as a TIFF review, but the page content is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. The headline characterizes the film as a talky spy picture set against changing realities; no specific praise or complaint is accessible.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
1 September 2011 · David Graham
40*

The review finds the film classy and serviceable but ultimately undercooked and lacking impact. It praises the cast, especially Ralph Fiennes, while faulting the strained relationships and episodic pacing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate