Critics’ reviews

Pandora and the Flying Dutchman (1951)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 69: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Pandora and the Flying Dutchman

69
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Pandora and the Flying Dutchman, with praise clustering around Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor cinematography and Ava Gardner’s screen presence. The photography wins approval even from reviewers who dislike the film, while admirers find its romance alluring and its blend of myth and atmosphere effective. Gardner’s magnetism is a recurring point of praise, alongside appreciation of her pairing with James Mason and the ease of her dialogue delivery.

The spread is wide, however, with reservations about lingering scenery and heavy sentimentality becoming outright objections among the dissenters. Variety finds the mood persistently sombre and depressing, and Gardner less distinctive, though it praises Mason and Cardiff. The Independent admires the visual allure but considers the story increasingly absurd. The main division is over how much the romantic mood sustains the film when the storytelling slows or strains belief.

Los Angeles Times
20 February 2020 · Edwin Schallert
90*

Schallert praises the film as a distinctive, romantically alluring creation. He singles out its scenic beauty and performances, while noting that lingering mood and scenery excursions interrupt the story.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 May 2010 · David Hughes
85*

The critic finds the film deliriously romantic and deserving of its restored re-release. They single out Ava Gardner’s magnetic performance and Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor cinematography for praise.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
85*

The piece is strongly positive, calling the film a Technicolor masterpiece that has stood the test of time. It singles out Jack Cardiff’s superb Technicolor cinematography as a major reason for its lasting appeal.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 May 2010 · Andrew Pulver
85*

Pulver finds the film an extraordinary, wonderfully effective blend of myth, romance and documentary. He particularly praises Ava Gardner’s screen presence and the film’s early Technicolor cinematography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 May 2010 · ★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

The printed four-star rating indicates a positive verdict. The visible metadata highlights Lewin’s unusual background, but the review text is unavailable to identify a specific point of praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1950 · Variety Staff
30*

The review finds the film persistently somber and depressing, with Ava Gardner less distinctive. It singles out James Mason’s performance and Jack Cardiff’s color photography as the production’s standout qualities.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 May 2010
20*

The critic finds the film a silly, increasingly absurd farrago, despite its visual allure. They single out Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor and Ava Gardner’s beauty for admiration.

Read the full review →
Paste
13 February 2020 · 8.0 · Andy Crump
87*

Crump finds the film a sumptuous, macabre romance made timeless by Gardner’s performance. He especially praises her magnetic screen presence and the playful ease of her dialogue delivery.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 May 2010 · Jennie Kermode
68*

Kermode finds the film powerful and engaging, despite its heavy sentimentality. She singles out the electric pairing of James Mason and Ava Gardner for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate