Critics’ reviews

Peter Pan (1953)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 66: 8 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Peter Pan

66
Positive
8
Mixed
4
Negative
1

Most critics like Disney’s Peter Pan, and the praise gathers in two places. The first is the look of it: the Technicolor animation and the colour and design schemes of Mary Blair are singled out repeatedly, even in reviews that have little time for the rest. The second is Captain Hook, whom several critics call the most entertaining thing on screen, with the crocodile, Smee and Tinker Bell close behind. The songs, the flying sequences and the brash energy of the action are mentioned often, and the earliest review is warm about the voice work of Bobby Driscoll, Kathryn Beaumont and Hans Conried.

The reservations are just as consistent. Most later reviews object to the depiction of the Native Americans, and several find that Disney softens Barrie’s darker thoughts about growing up into something thin and muddled. The spread is wide. The Guardian finds Barrie’s magic almost entirely absent, and Slant Magazine, the lone outright negative, calls the film a footnote in Disney’s output.

The Hollywood Reporter
5 February 2019 · THR Staff
90*

The critic praises the Disney animated adaptation for its charm and beauty in capturing the imaginative spirit of childhood in a way that captivates both adults and children. They highlight the Technicolor fantasy sets, lilting music score, and direction by Hamilton Luske, Clyde Geronimi, and Wilfred Jackson.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1952 · Variety Staff
90*

The review calls the Disney animated feature a cartoon of enchanting quality that brings Barrie's fantasy to the screen with strong voice work and lively action. It praises the performances of Bobby Driscoll as Peter, Kathryn Beaumont as Wendy, and Hans Conried as Hook, while noting the score highlights the comedy and adventure.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 July 2006 · Ian Nathan
75*

The critic praises the film's enchanting animation, catchy songs, energetic wit and the memorable Captain Hook as a standout villain. However, it notes that the Disney approach softens the darker, more complex themes of J.M. Barrie's original play about growing up.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 July 1989 · Charles Solomon
70*

The re-release review describes the 1953 Disney film as one of the most exciting and colorful in the canon, highlighting its brash energy, flying sequences, and comic Hook-crocodile battles as magical cinematic moments. It notes the film's enduring appeal while criticizing the dated depiction of the Indians.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 March 2007 · B- · Scott Tobias
70

The review finds that the 1953 film restores some innocence to Peter Pan amid modern associations but notes that time has not been kind due to problematic stereotypes and superficial handling of growing up. It singles out Captain Hook as the most entertaining element that saves the movie.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 March 2014 · PM
70*

The critic notes Disney's alterations to the source material, such as American voices and songs, but concludes that overlooking these allows viewers to enjoy the film's vibrant Technicolor animation.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
65*

The postwar Disney animated features are often dismissed, and Peter Pan has its faults including underdeveloped characters, a thin story, and muddled themes. However, it is a colossal mistake to overlook the film for its stunning color and design schemes by the influential Mary Blair, which look especially terrific on the new Blu-ray release.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· DM
50*

The critic notes that JM Barrie magic is almost entirely absent from Disney's 1953 animated feature. State-of-the-art draughtsmanship is singled out as a positive.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 February 1953
50*

The review covers the release of Disney's full-length color cartoon adaptation of the Barrie play at the Roxy. It focuses on the animated treatment of the classic story with its characters and fantasy elements.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 March 2007 · Eric Henderson
30*

The critic views the film as a footnote in Disney's output, criticizing its commercialized and problematic elements including stereotypes and themes of arrested development. They single out the re-release extras and digital remastering for commentary on the film's enduring but flawed iconography.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 June 2018 · Dave Trumbore
85*

The critic praises the timeless quality of the 1953 Disney classic's animation, music, and story. The anniversary Blu-ray edition is recommended as a must-buy for its extensive bonus features exploring the film's production.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
15 March 2007 · Amber Wilkinson
70*

The critic finds the adventure still has heart, praising the supporting cast like Hook, Smee, the crocodile, and Tinker Bell, but notes it's not quite the classic claimed, with dated social mores and offensive depictions of Native Americans.

Read the full review →
/Film
5 February 2018 · Josh Spiegel
50*

The piece grapples with the film's memorable imagery and music alongside its problematic retrograde depictions of women and people of color, noting it endures despite these flaws.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate