Critics’ reviews

Pina (2011)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 74: 11 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Pina

74
Positive
11
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Pina as a moving tribute to Pina Bausch, with praise centred on the dancers’ physical commitment and Wenders’ use of 3D. The reviews repeatedly credit the depth of the images with giving the choreography a compelling screen presence, rather than merely recording it. The company’s performances carry much of the emotion, and even several less persuaded critics admire how the film brings dance into cinema.

The reservations concern what surrounds those performances, and what is missing. Several critics find the dancers’ interviews distracting or repetitive; others want more context about Bausch’s life and work. The spread is wide despite the positive majority, ranging from enthusiastic endorsements to complaints of excessive reverence and muddle. The New Yorker offers a distinct objection: it admires the 3D but argues that the outdoor staging and emphasis on dance underrepresent the unsettling theatrical side of Bausch’s work.

Los Angeles Times
13 January 2012 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Turan calls the film a knockout and praises its immersive use of 3-D to bring Pina Bausch’s dances vividly to the screen. He finds the dancer interviews less effective, saying they distract from the dances themselves.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 April 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Bradshaw finds the film a tremendous, poignant tribute that captures the yearning at the heart of Bausch’s work. He especially praises the dancers’ overwhelming physicality and the way 3D gives the choreography presence.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
22 December 2011 · B+ · Eric Kohn
83

Kohn finds the film visually beautiful and heartfelt, but ultimately slight and not essential. He praises the immersive use of 3D while criticizing the reminiscences for distracting from Bausch’s dances.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 December 2011 · ★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
80

The available page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is not exposed in the accessible text. No specific element praised or criticized is available.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2011 · David Hughes
78*

The review calls the film a worthy, moving tribute to Pina Bausch. It praises the ensemble’s heartfelt performances and the way 3D captures the emotion in Bausch’s choreography.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 February 2011 · festival review · Leslie Felperin
75*

Felperin finds the film captivating, though its lack of context may frustrate newcomers and dance purists. She praises its immersive presentation of Bausch’s choreography, especially the performances by her company.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 February 2011 · festival review · THR Staff
70*

The review calls the film a must for dance buffs and praises Wenders’ assured, stylish use of 3D. It singles out the strange, hypnotic dances and their imaginative settings, while noting that Bausch’s personal life and motivations remain unexplored.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 February 2011 · festival review · Lee Marshall
65*

The accessible page does not reveal Marshall’s verdict or a specific point of praise or complaint. The review text is behind a registration prompt.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 October 2011 · ★★/4 · Jaime N. Christley
50

The critic finds the film overly deferential and distracting, despite its impressive subject. They praise its ability to convey Bausch’s singular creative stature and the dancers’ performances.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 January 2012 · Joan Acocella
40*

Acocella finds the film visually impressive but not especially representative of Bausch’s work. She praises its expert use of 3-D while faulting the outdoor staging and emphasis on dance over the unsettling theatrical scenes.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
26 April 2011 · ★★★★½ · Jamie Neish
90

The critic calls the film a majestic, enterprising tribute to Pina Bausch. They single out Wenders’ bold cinematography and carefully integrated 3D for making the choreography especially compelling.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
13 January 2012 · Alonso Duralde
90*

The critic calls the documentary an exhilarating, must-see celebration of Pina Bausch’s work. They praise Wenders’ kinetic use of 3D, while finding the dancers’ interviews repetitive.

Read the full review →
Paste
24 December 2011 · 8.7/10 · Emily Kirkpatrick
87

Kirkpatrick gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, calling it a haunting and beautiful elegy. She praises how 3D draws viewers into the dancers’ performances and merges art with everyday life.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 October 2011 · Anne-Katrin Titze
85*

The critic calls the film a powerful homage, though Wenders’s occasional sentimentality feels too heavy. She praises the immersive 3D presentation of Bausch’s choreography and its precise attention to movement.

Read the full review →
Collider
8 September 2011 · C · Matt Goldberg
57

Goldberg finds the film visually splendid but ultimately muddled and tiresome. He praises Wenders’s blend of theater and cinema, especially the use of 3D and static framing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate