Critics’ reviews

Planet of the Apes (2001)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 34: 1 positive, 1 mixed, 13 negative.

Back to our review of Planet of the Apes

34
Positive
1
Mixed
1
Negative
13

Most critics dislike Tim Burton’s 2001 remake, and they dislike it for the same reasons. Thirteen of fifteen reviews are negative. What praise there is goes to the ape make-up, which nearly everyone judges first-rate, and to the actors working underneath it, Tim Roth above all, with Helena Bonham Carter a frequent second. Several also admire the opening sequence and Burton’s eye, and concede the film is handsome enough to look at.

The reservations cluster on the story. Critics call the script thin, muddled and short on ideas next to the 1968 original, and most find Mark Wahlberg a bland lead. Many note how little of Burton’s usual strangeness survives. The spread is narrow: almost every review sits around the same low mark, and only The New York Times comes out in favour, finding wit and energy the others miss. The Evening Standard goes further than most, objecting to what it reads as a racist allegory.

The New York Times
27 July 2001 · Elvis Mitchell
70*

The critic finds glimmers of wit and energy in Burton's remake, praising the graceful opening and the film's visual style with a hint of schlock.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

It is a mixed re-imagining with upgraded ape make-up allowing strong performances from Roth and Bonham Carter, but the story is slight and convenient with no emotional depth for Wahlberg; the twist ending works but quoting the original feels wrong.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
40*

The review describes Burton's re-imagining as facetious and forgettable, owing as much to pop ephemera as to its themes; it notes visual élan and strong ape performances (especially Roth) but criticizes the slapdash narrative and climax.

Read the full review →
Empire
17 August 2001 · Angie Errigo
30*

The critic finds the film visually striking with strong make-up and effects work but criticizes it as dramatically thin and unengaging, with weak lead performances and little socio-political depth.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
27 July 2001 · Kenneth Turan
30*

Burton's visual gift is on display but the film is disappointingly not very fun, lacking surprise despite strong performances like Tim Roth's evil ape.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
27 July 2001
30*

The critic calls it a truly mediocre picture that lacks Burton's singular vision, suffering from a pallid Wahlberg performance, confused storytelling, lack of dramatic momentum, a disappointing twist, and a mish-mash of visual styles.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 January 2015 · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
30*

The critic highlights how the film's promising opening credits sequence, scored by Danny Elfman, sets up expectations for a superior movie that the rest of Tim Burton's misguided 2001 remake fails to deliver, devolving into poor execution after the credits.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 August 2001 · Philip French
30*

The critic finds Tim Burton's remake bland and idea-light compared to the 1968 original, relying mostly on special effects and prosthetic make-up rather than satire or surprise. He singles out the faultless make-up and a brief, amusing moment featuring Charlton Heston for minor praise amid an otherwise disappointing re-imagining.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 July 2001 · David Denby
30*

The film is spectacular but empty, with Tim Roth as the standout ape; Burton's dynamic style fails to match the original's intelligence and emotional pull.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 July 2001 · Todd McCarthy
30*

The pairing of Burton and the material is a mismatch; the reworking is listless, witless, conventional and lacking Burton's trademark weirdness.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
10*

The critic dismisses the film as expensive but dramatically inert summer schlock that fails as witty satire or suspense and carries an unwelcome racist allegory by equating apes with Black characters and post-colonial themes.

Read the full review →
Vulture
10 May 2024
10*

The piece ranks the 2001 film last among Apes movies, describing it as a complete disaster with lazy storytelling, inattention to detail, and a lack of Tim Burton's characteristic curiosity, despite an intriguing ending.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 September 2011 · Stephen Carty
40*

The re-imagining falls way short of expectations despite strong ape makeup effects and standout performances from Tim Roth and Helena Bonham Carter. It plays like a compromised popcorn adventure with little of Burton's usual quirkiness, bland human leads, and a muddled story that hints at behind-the-scenes problems.

Read the full review →
Collider
8 July 2014 · D · Matt Goldberg
37

The critic finds Burton's reimagining devoid of personality or fun, resulting in a humorless and forgettable film whose action climax is obscured and ineffective.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 October 2009 · Carley Tauchert
30*

The critic finds the 2001 Tim Burton remake underwhelming overall, with an undercooked script that lacks the stakes and depth of the 1968 original and a miscast lead in Mark Wahlberg. The standout element is the impressive prosthetic ape makeup and performances, achieved through practical effects and ape school training for the actors.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate