Critics’ reviews

Police Academy (1984)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 62: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Police Academy

62
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards a mixed reception, with most critics finding some laughs in Police Academy’s goofy recruits and clashes with authority. Praise centres on its affable, often innocent humour and supporting performances: Variety singles out Michael Winslow’s human sound effects, while Empire finds the comedy consistently funny and argues that it deserves more respect than its reputation allows. Even the qualified responses find something appealing in its silliness.

The reservations concern uneven jokes, fragmented writing and the point at which broad humour becomes merely crude. Vulture accepts the messiness for the sake of the charm, whereas The New York Times finds the gags more crude than amusing. The spread is fairly wide, though enthusiasm is less common than qualification; the evidence also has limits, with one verdict unverifiable and two others represented only by partial text.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Dinning
75*

The critic finds the film consistently funny and more deserving of respect than its reputation suggests. The sweet, naïve humour and standout supporting performances are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Vulture
19 May 2018 · Alden Ford
70*

Ford finds the film a messy but affable comedy that remains somewhat funny. He praises its harmless, goofy charm while criticizing its implausible premise, fragmented writing, and uneven jokes.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1983 · Variety Staff
65*

The review finds the comedy harmless and innocent, with a fresh setting but uneven results. It especially praises Michael Winslow’s performance as a human sound-effects system.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint can be identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
63*

The available text signals a critique of the film’s vulgar humour, but does not reveal the critic’s overall verdict. It singles out the barrage of vulgar jokes as a notable feature.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Ferguson says the original produced its fair share of belly laughs and unexpectedly spawned a long-running franchise. He highlights the oddball recruits’ clashes with authority and eventual proving of themselves.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 March 1984 · Janet Maslin
35*

Maslin's verdict is negative, finding the comedy more crude than amusing. The film's broad, gag-driven approach is what the review singles out.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate