Critics’ reviews

Porco Rosso (1992)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 74: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Porco Rosso

74
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics like Porco Rosso, and the praise clusters on the same things: the colour of the animation and the seaplane dogfights over the Adriatic, which several reviews call the reason to watch. A number are struck by how much Miyazaki fits around a pig in a cockpit: pre-fascist Italy, aviation history, the men who came home from war, and women who are consistently smarter and more capable than the men around them. Comparisons run to Tintin and to Casablanca, with the hero cast as a gruff, decent Bogart figure.

The reservations are mild and land on the story. Radio Times finds the adult plot flimsy and underdeveloped and misses the director’s usual charm, and Empire, though approving, thinks Miyazaki has made stronger films. The spread is narrow, with no negative notices; the warmest reviews come from critics who take the anti-war material seriously rather than treating it as a backdrop to the flying.

The Guardian
3 February 2006
80*

Porco Rosso is an early Studio Ghibli film from Miyazaki about a pig who is an air ace turned bounty hunter in the Adriatic; the plot is secondary to the delightful, colourful animation and exhilarating seaplane flying sequences. The bizarre premise contrasts with the director's limpid style, akin to Tintin but with greater artistic depth that would later flower in films like Spirited Away.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 September 2009 · David Jenkins
80*

The critic describes Miyazaki’s 1992 animation as wonderful, focusing on the pig pilot’s dogfights with air pirates in the Adriatic and its digressions into pre-fascist Italy, aviation history and gender equality.

Read the full review →
Empire
11 January 2006 · William Thomas
70*

The critic calls it a solid Miyazaki film with an elegiac edge exploring disappointed masculinity through its pig-faced pilot protagonist and vintage plane action. It draws comparisons to The Quiet Man and The Incredibles but notes the director has made stronger films.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
24 February 2015 · Chris Cabin
70*

The critic praises the film's personal subtext on war survivors and Miyazaki's self-reflective themes, along with its vibrant animation, action sequences, and jovial yet contemplative tone. The disc's A/V transfer is excellent, though extras are skimpy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 December 2011 · Critic’s Pick · Jeannette Catsoulis
70*

The critic praises this re-release of Miyazaki’s 1992 adventure as an irresistible, pastel-pretty yarn that blends fantasy and history, muting adult concerns like fascism with whimsical elements. She singles out the director’s feminism, noting how female characters are smarter, braver and more resourceful than their male counterparts.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sloan Freer
60

The critic praises the rich, imaginative animation and its vibrancy that appeals to all ages while faulting the adult storyline as flimsy, underdeveloped and lacking the director’s usual charm.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
2 February 2006 · Anton Bitel
85*

The critic praises the film as an animated prequel to Casablanca set in interwar Europe, with Porco himself as a gruff yet decent hero in the Bogart mold. Miyazaki is singled out for grounding the fantasy in meticulous period detail and realistic aerial sequences while delivering anti-war themes with broad appeal.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
9 June 2022 · Zoe Crombie
85*

The critic hails Porco Rosso as an anti-war masterpiece and outlier in the Ghibli canon for its 1930s Italian setting and morally ambiguous pig-man protagonist. They single out its evolution from a simple in-flight entertainment project into a complex meditation on fighting against a cursed world.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate