Critics’ reviews

Predator (1987)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 65: 4 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Predator

65
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics lean towards Predator as an effective action thriller, with praise clustering around John McTiernan’s tense direction, the jungle setting and the special effects. Schwarzenegger’s physical presence is another asset, particularly when the film makes its imposing hero seem vulnerable. Favourable reviews value the stripped-down storytelling and brisk action rather than looking for much characterisation. The photography and oppressive atmosphere also earn some respect from critics who find little else to admire.

The spread is wide, however, and the main disagreement concerns whether the craft compensates for the thin script. Some reviews find the effects sustain tension; others see them replacing suspense. The New York Times finds the action alternately grisly and dull, preferring the jungle habitat to what happens in it. The Los Angeles Times is harsher about the empty, derivative writing, while allowing limited praise for McTiernan’s visual flair and the cinematography.

RogerEbert.com
12 June 1987 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

Ebert finds the film an effective, high-energy action picture that begins like Rambo and ends like Alien. He singles out the beautiful and convincing jungle locations in Mexico for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This is one of Schwarzenegger's most efficient movies, a stripped-down thriller that sacrifices characterisation for exhilarating action and special effects. McTiernan keeps the tension at snapping point with the cloaking device gimmick.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1986 · Variety Staff
60*

The review calls it a slightly above-average actioner that compensates for a tissue-thin plot with grisly death sequences and impressive special effects. It notes that director John McTiernan relies too much on special effects thermal vision photography.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 June 1987 · Janet Maslin
40*

Maslin describes the film as alternately grisly and dull with few surprises, noting that it starts as a commando mission before turning into a monster movie. She singles out the interesting jungle habitat over the action itself.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 June 1987 · Michael Wilmington
30*

Wilmington calls the film an ominous high-tech Stone Age mixture with an empty, feeble, and derivative script. He singles out the visual flair of director John McTiernan and the cinematography for limited praise amid the vacuity.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Chris Hewitt

The critic finds Predator more than a dumb 80s actioner and a sci-fi/action classic thanks to McTiernan's assured, tense direction. The Predator creature and Schwarzenegger's heroic performance at his physical peak are singled out as memorable highlights.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
9 November 2017 · Adam Barker

The film fuses outer-space horror with Vietnam-war allegory and plays on Schwarzenegger's star image by casting him as the vulnerable human against the alien. Special effects substitute for suspense, making the final conflict predictable.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 June 1987 · Duane Byrge

The critic finds the film a well-executed entry in the behind-enemy-lines buddy movie genre, with strong camaraderie among the team and Schwarzenegger's commanding presence. Direction, kinetic photography by Donald McAlpine, and technical credits including the percussive score are singled out as assets.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 September 2014 · NF

Arnie's platoon is picked off by an invisible alien adversary in a fight to the death. The film has the look of an expensive production but the feel of a B movie, delivering undemanding monster mayhem.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 June 2002 · Gator MacReady
85*

The critic calls it one of Arnie's best and a landmark action movie. McTiernan creates an oppressive atmosphere and turns the final act into a gothic landscape highlighting primitive brutality over advanced weapons.

Read the full review →
Collider
29 September 2022 · B+ · Rae Torres
83

The critic views the film as an enjoyable 80s action classic centered on macho men battling an invisible alien hunter, despite its cheesy dialogue and tropes. They single out its fast pace, strong special effects for the era, and effective man-versus-monster survival theme for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate