Critics’ reviews

Pride & Prejudice (2005)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 75: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Pride & Prejudice

75
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Joe Wright’s Pride & Prejudice as a lively, earthy adaptation, with praise clustering around Keira Knightley’s spirited Elizabeth Bennet. The reviews repeatedly pick out her wit, confidence and warmth, alongside period detail that makes the Bennet household feel lived in rather than preserved for inspection. Wright’s youthful pace and the central romance also find broad support, though critics differ over how much Austen’s social satire survives the emphasis on feeling.

The spread is wide despite the positive lean, and even less enthusiastic reviews tend to admire Knightley. Darcy is a dividing point: The New York Times welcomes Matthew Macfadyen’s more human portrayal, while Eye for Film finds him dull and unappealing. The New Yorker objects to melodramatic imagery pushing Austen towards Brontë. Slant Magazine offers a broader dissent, finding the adaptation familiar and its casting uneven despite the efforts at realism.

RogerEbert.com
10 November 2005 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film as one of the most delightful adaptations of Austen, highlighting Keira Knightley's spirited and fierce performance as Elizabeth Bennet. He singles out the robust, earthy period detail and the emotional payoff of the central romance for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
16 September 2005
85*

The critic applauds first-time director Joe Wright for injecting youthful energy and visual flair into the adaptation, with Keira Knightley delivering a captivating Elizabeth. Minor issues with Matthew MacFadyen's Darcy and Brenda Blethyn's Mrs Bennet are noted, but overall it reveals new strengths in Austen's story.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sloan Freer
80

Joe Wright's debut delivers a gutsy, less idealised take on Austen's novel, focusing on wit and intellect with a strong lead performance from Keira Knightley as a spirited Elizabeth Bennet.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 September 2005 · Peter Bradshaw
80*

The critic calls it a clever, elegant rendering of Austen that satisfies traditional period conventions while benefiting from strong performances. Keira Knightley's outstanding, witty turn as Lizzy Bennet lifts the whole film and is singled out for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 November 2005 · Stephen Holden
80*

The review finds the adaptation satisfyingly rich in romance, historical detail and social satire, with Knightley's radiant presence shifting the emphasis toward a more glamorous Elizabeth. It notes Matthew Macfadyen's humanized Darcy as a strength while acknowledging the film's brisk, crowd-pleasing liberties with the novel.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Derek Malcom
75*

The critic finds Joe Wright's version an enjoyable, grittier take on Austen's novel with a strong Elizabeth from Keira Knightley and a shrewd look at the era's social constraints. Some casting veers toward caricature, but strong performances and entertainment value prevail.

Read the full review →
The Times
17 September 2005 · Wendy Ide
75*

The critic finds this the second big-screen adaptation in decades a strong contender that captures the story's playfulness and youthfulness without over-prettifying it. Knightley's age-appropriate Lizzy and the incendiary chemistry with MacFadyen's Darcy are highlighted as key strengths.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
7 November 2005 · Anthony Lane
70*

The critic notes the film plays fast and loose with Austen in a welcome way, delivering brisk storytelling and strong performances, especially Knightley's crisp Elizabeth. He complains that the adaptation Brontë-fies the material with melodramatic visuals and mood, turning it into something more romantic and less ironic than the novel.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
31 October 2005 · Jason Clark
40*

The critic finds the film overly familiar despite attempts at realism in lighting and dialogue. Knightley delivers a strong lead performance, but miscasting and a dull Darcy undermine the adaptation.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 September 2005 · festival review

The film is a commercial, accessible chick-flick romance with faithful period details and strong supporting turns, though it may feel too obvious for purists and lurches into pastiche by the end.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound

The critic praises the film's fine casting, especially Keira Knightley's warm and confident performance as Lizzy Bennet, and its evocative cinematography and production design that bring a lively, gritty energy to the story.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
16 September 2005 · Angus Wolfe Murray
65*

The critic praises Keira Knightley's lively, expressive performance as Elizabeth and the fresh, lived-in energy of the Bennet household and country house balls. He criticizes Matthew Macfadyen's portrayal of Darcy as an unlikeable, brooding bore who lacks appeal.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate