Critics’ reviews

Prometheus (2012)

28 reviews from 28 publications. Critics’ score 64: 14 positive, 7 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Prometheus

64
Positive
14
Mixed
7
Negative
4

Most critics come down on the side of Prometheus, though rarely by much. The praise gathers almost entirely around how it looks: the production design, the scale of the environments, the creature effects and the crisp photography are singled out by nearly every review, including the hostile ones. Michael Fassbender’s android David is the performance most often named, with Noomi Rapace a close second, and several critics pick out the same surgery-machine sequence as the film’s most frightening stretch.

The reservations are just as consistent. The script is called thin, the characters foolish, the big questions about creation raised and then dropped, and the comparison with Alien goes against it almost every time. The spread is wide. RogerEbert.com treats it as a major work of ideas; The New Yorker finds nothing in it but bombast; Empire, reviewing earlier than most, judges it hollow. In between, a large middle finds it entertaining and not much more.

RogerEbert.com
6 June 2012 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic calls it a magnificent science-fiction film that raises profound questions about the origin of human life without providing answers, in the tradition of golden-age sci-fi. He singles out the staggering visuals, expert horror sequences, mind-challenging ideas, and the performances, especially Noomi Rapace's resourceful lead.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 June 2012 · B+ · Tasha Robinson
83

Technically and visually impressive with gorgeous design and a thoughtful exploration phase, but undermined by foolish character decisions, dropped ideas and a shift into silly blockbuster action that leaves it more intellectual than visceral and not fully satisfying on either level.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
1 June 2012 · Matt Mueller
80*

The critic highlights the film's eye-popping visuals and its role as an 'Alien' origin myth. He praises Ridley Scott's direction for delivering a visually spectacular experience that expands the franchise's lore.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Terry Staunton
80

The critic praises the film as a rattling space opera that explores themes of creation and mortality while delivering a thrilling, well-paced story with solid performances and arresting visuals. They highlight how it shares DNA with Alien but stands as a precursor with profound questions.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 May 2012 · festival review
80*

The critic highlights Ridley Scott's striking sense of vision and ability to deliver intelligent and visceral filmmaking in this anticipated sci-fi epic. They single out the masterful visualisation of environments, perfectly shot sequences, and the film's capacity to thrill and provoke audiences.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
30 May 2012 · Tim Robey
75*

Ridley Scott's elaborate sci-fi freakout is majestic to look at and full of tentacular mayhem, pushing the genre into queasy new places with fresh terror in key sequences. It struggles with tone and expectations as a partial prequel but delivers vigorous spectacle worth revisiting.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 May 2012 · Jonathan Crocker
75*

Ridley Scott returns to sci-fi with a visually stunning, ambitious film that builds mythology around the Alien universe's Space Jockey, featuring strong performances especially from Michael Fassbender, though it lacks the primal horror of the originals.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 May 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic finds Ridley Scott's return to the Alien universe grandiose and muddled, though very watchable with a scene-stealing performance from Michael Fassbender as the android David. It lacks the central killer punch, satirical brilliance and tough rationalist attack of the original Alien.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
30 May 2012 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The critic finds it a visually stunning but not classic return to sci-fi by Ridley Scott that caters too much to audience expectations; praises the technical achievements and performances but notes it falls short of being a benchmark like Alien or Blade Runner.

Read the full review →
The Independent
1 June 2012
70*

The critic finds it a tremendously enjoyable if slightly cheesy return to the Alien universe with familiar pleasures, praising the entertainment value despite not being groundbreaking. They single out the grotesque alien birth scenes and Fassbender's android for note.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
8 June 2012
65*

The critic finds Prometheus not quite up to the hype and closer to the original Alien than claimed, being overblown and overlong with a bossy score, but praises its scary monsters, Fassbender's terrific android performance, and its status as a fascinating franchise development and amazing spectacle.

Read the full review →
Vulture
8 June 2012 · David Edelstein
65*

Praises the film's exploration of origins and sci-fi saga elements, noting it tells a bigger story well with satisfying climax, but misses the visceral body horror and Giger influence of the original Alien, making it feel inorganic.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
1 June 2012 · 5/3/3 · Matt Bochenski
60

The critic calls it an overreaching folly that is visually spectacular but intellectually wayward and narratively unfocused, with a logical flaw at its heart. They single out the exquisite visuals and strong performances, particularly Michael Fassbender as the android David and Noomi Rapace in a standout scene.

Read the full review →
The Times
3 June 2012 · Cosmo Landesman
60*

The critic praises wonderful moments and subtle details but criticizes serious flaws including it being hard to follow with creature confusion by the end.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 July 2011 · ★★★ · Tom Huddleston
60

Calls it an expensive, ideas-heavy sci-fi horror but ultimately just another monsters-in-space movie with a flat script and thin characters. Praises the crisp photography, stunning design and bracing set pieces but notes it falls short of expectations.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 January 2011 · Ian Nathan
40*

The film boasts Scott's visual flair and ambition in exploring big ideas and the Space Jockey backstory but suffers from a poor script, thin characters, lack of suspense and atmosphere, leaving viewers with an empty feeling.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 June 2012
30*

The film pesters audiences with thin profundities and cornball cosmic mysticism while attempting fan-service through unresolved plot threads and high-minded pretensions that fail to deliver satisfying answers or thrills.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 June 2012 · Richard Brody
10*

The review dismisses the film as lacking inspiration, substance, and humor, relying instead on pseudo-mythological bombast and a lumbering audiovisual scheme. The earnestness and cast are singled out for complaint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 June 2012 · Kenneth Turan

The film is seen as a disappointment by the director's high standards, with less to say than it thinks, though it delivers thrills and involvement beyond much summer fare. Production design, cinematography, and storytelling skill are praised.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 June 2012 · A.O. Scott

The critic finds visual grandeur and awe in the first hour but notes disappointment as the story and themes become clearer. Scott's sense of scale and the 3-D are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
30 May 2012 · Justin Chang

The film remains earthbound in narrative terms despite elaborate visuals, hinting at higher intelligence without showing much of its own. Visual design and a squirm-inducing sequence are highlighted positively amid complaints about volume and lack of menace.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 June 2012 · B · Matt Goldberg
77

The film overreaches in trying to answer questions from the original Alien while delivering a self-contained mystery. It succeeds through its gorgeous visuals, thrilling pace, sci-fi horror, and strong performances, especially Michael Fassbender's.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
1 June 2012 · Anton Bitel
75*

The critic finds it a film full of big ideas and even bigger spectacle, praising the grand scale, creature effects, and philosophical questions about origins of life, while noting it may disappoint hype but stands on its own terms.

Read the full review →
/Film
4 June 2012 · 7/10 · Germain Lussier
70

The critic finds the film overly ambitious and entertaining but flawed, with too many plot threads that muddy the narrative. They single out the dense, exciting first half and original visuals for praise while noting the lack of focus compared to Alien.

Read the full review →
NME
1 June 2012 · Owen Nicholls
70*

The critic acknowledges flaws in plotting and characterisation but urges viewers to see the film anyway, praising its stunning visuals in every frame and Michael Fassbender’s standout performance as the android David. The verdict highlights the film’s audacious ambition despite its imperfections.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
30 May 2012 · ★★★ · Emma Dibdin
60

The review calls the film consistently entertaining with fresh body horror and breathtaking visuals but ultimately empty at its core, lacking cumulative dread or emotional impact. It singles out Noomi Rapace’s performance as providing the needed heart amid the spectacle.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
4 June 2012 · Alonso Duralde
55*

The critic finds 'Prometheus' a sleek but ultimately disappointing prequel that delivers scares and strong performances yet fails to match the original 'Alien' films. He singles out the tension and horror in a surgery-machine sequence involving Noomi Rapace for praise while criticizing the overly explanatory script.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
31 May 2012 · ★★ · James Peaty
40

The critic finds the film a disappointment that fails to deliver on its hype, undermined by weak story logic, lack of tension, and an inability to balance pretensions with franchise conventions. He singles out the director’s strong eye for set design and visual composition, especially on the ship and in isolated sequences, for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate