Critics’ reviews

Rear Window (1954)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 79: 5 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Rear Window

79
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics find Rear Window an absorbing suspense film, with praise centred on Hitchcock’s control of viewpoint and the way watching the neighbours draws the audience into the guilt of spying. The confined courtyard, uncluttered storytelling and carefully used natural sounds are recurring strengths. The reviews also value the humour and romance, particularly the interplay between Stewart and Kelly and Ritter’s dry delivery, as relief from the mounting tension.

The disagreement concerns whether that restricted setup creates enough drama. The New York Times finds it entertaining but regards it chiefly as a clever visual exercise, lacking the sense of personal danger in earlier Hitchcock. The Guardian dissents more sharply, finding the single-set approach static, the leads stilted and the experience often dull, despite admiring the premise and spare sound. The spread is wide, then, though the reservations are concentrated in a small minority of the reviews.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

The critic calls it a masterpiece that began as a technical stunt but became a classic study of voyeurism. Tension builds brilliantly, complemented by sexy repartee between Stewart and Kelly and dry humour from Thelma Ritter.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 October 1983 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls it a perfectly constructed film that draws viewers into its voyeuristic premise alongside James Stewart's character. He singles out the simple, uncluttered structure and the way the audience shares the guilt of spying.

Read the full review →
Total Film
4 February 2000
90*

The review hails the restored print as one of Hitchcock's most enthralling films and a masterly meditation on voyeurism and spectatorship. It singles out the subjective point-of-view shooting and the ambiguous final shot for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 July 1954 · William Brogdon
85*

Brogdon calls it one of Hitchcock's better thrillers and a tight suspense show with strong commercial prospects. He highlights the director's technical and artistic skills, the confined courtyard setting, and the effective use of natural sounds and performances.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 August 1954 · Bosley Crowther
70*

Crowther finds the film absorbing and entertaining in a morbid way but considers it a clever pictorial exercise rather than top-tier Hitchcock. He praises the observational setup but notes it lacks the subjective danger of earlier works like Notorious.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 February 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
40*

The critic finds Rear Window the most overrated Hitchcock classic, often dull, static and undramatic due to its single-set limitations. The urban voyeurism premise is intriguing and the ascetic sound design pleasing, but the film is ultimately frustrating and literal-minded, with stilted leads.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 July 1954 · Jack Moffitt

The critic calls it one of the directional masterpieces of recent years and recommends exhibitors buy and play it for strong box office and audience pleasure. He singles out the impressive set design, the warm love story with Grace Kelly, and the continuous laughs alongside suspense.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate