Critics’ reviews

Rocky (1976)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 77: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Rocky

77
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Rocky as an underdog story whose emotional pull outweighs its familiar plotting. Praise centres on Sylvester Stallone’s convincing, charismatic performance, with the supporting cast and awkward, sharp dialogue giving the relationships weight. The reviews also credit John Avildsen’s use of streets, gyms and quieter locations with grounding the fairytale in a recognisable working-class environment. The training and fight sequences draw praise for making that personal struggle exciting.

The divide concerns how much contrivance the film can carry. For its admirers, the manipulation works because the characters and their hopes matter; familiar Hollywood storytelling is no obstacle to involvement. The New York Times dissents sharply, finding the screenplay stale, the direction indecisive and Stallone’s dominance self-serving. The spread is therefore wider than the broadly positive consensus suggests, with disagreement over the same old-fashioned qualities that most critics find affecting.

RogerEbert.com
1 January 1976 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film succeeds as an involving story of an underdog hero rather than its clichéd plot. Ebert praises Sylvester Stallone's charismatic lead performance and the emotional power of the training and fight sequences.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

The film is the second greatest boxing movie of all time after Raging Bull and Stallone's only real cinematic achievement. Avildsen uses locations masterfully and delivers charming scenes like the ice rink sequence while knowing exactly when to stop.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Marriott
80

The review highlights the film's genuine impassioned commitment and its roots in Stallone's personal drive for stardom. It praises Stallone's convincing performance as the mumbling underdog and notes the film's Oscar wins over strong 1976 competition.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · DP
80*

The critic calls it an old-fashioned fairytale brilliantly revamped for the depressed mood of the 1970s, whose underdog success mirrors its theme. They single out the cathartic big fight climax as manipulative Hollywood at its best, along with sharp dialogue and strong supporting performances.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 November 1976 · A.D. Murphy
70*

Strong emotional impact comes from the gritty street and gym environment created by Avildsen. Murphy notes manipulative elements but recommends letting the fairy-tale underdog story work on audiences.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 November 1976 · Vincent Canby
40*

The screenplay is pure 1930s Hollywood make-believe executed without verve under indecisive direction. Canby criticizes it as a vanity project overly dominated by Stallone.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 November 1976 · Arthur Knight

The critic praises Rocky as an ode to the human spirit, highlighting its portrayal of an underdog transforming himself through determination and self-belief. They single out the exciting fight footage, strong performances, and director John Avildsen's insightful direction and pacing for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Collider
8 March 2023 · B+ · Elisa Guimarães
83

The critic views Rocky as a gritty melodrama centered on feelings and relationships rather than boxing action, set in a violent, depersonalizing world where characters are valued only for what they provide. It praises the film's honest, awkward dialogue and performances that capture the struggle for honor and the thrill of the fight in a working-class underdog story.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate