Critics’ reviews

Scott Walker: 30 Century Man (2007)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 69: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Scott Walker: 30 Century Man

69
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics like Scott Walker: 30 Century Man, and the praise clusters in the same places: the access Kijak gets to a famously private musician, the archival performances, and the sequences in which fellow musicians listen to Walker’s records and react with open astonishment. Several reviewers see it as an affectionate tribute that will please longtime fans and send newcomers to the albums, and the animated interpretations of the songs are picked out as the film’s most distinctive touch.

The spread is wide. Two reviews pull hard against the rest: The Guardian finds the film painfully reverent, with a rock-nerd feel its graphics cannot disguise, while The Hollywood Reporter struggles to take it seriously and suggests its treatment of Walker’s perfectionism tips into absurdity. Even one of the admirers has doubts about Walker’s later music and some of the film’s choices. The reviews lean positive, but the dissenters are not mild.

Time Out
24 April 2007 · ★★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
100

The review calls the film a definitive portrait of an elusive musician and says it has nearly everything one could want from a music documentary. It singles out the breadth of the film’s coverage as a strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
30 March 2007 · empire
85*

Empire calls the documentary captivating, especially for fans of Scott Walker or music more broadly. It praises the access to Walker and highlights a sequence where musicians listen to his albums in astonishment.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
27 February 2009 · Mark Olsen
75*

Olsen presents the documentary as an engaging tribute to Scott Walker and his unconventional musical path. He particularly praises the musicians’ reactions to Walker’s recordings, which convey their surprise and delight.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 December 2008 · N.P. Thompson
75*

Thompson sees the documentary as an affecting tribute, despite criticizing Walker’s later music and some of the film’s choices. The review especially praises the archival performances and Kijak’s sensitive, evocative visual presentation.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 March 2007 · festival review · Eddie Cockrell
75*

Cockrell finds the documentary absorbing and expects it to delight Walker’s longtime fans while attracting new listeners. He singles out the animated interpretations of Walker’s songs as the film’s most interesting touch.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 November 2006 · Jonathan Romney
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its paywall prevents access to the critic’s verdict. The visible text does not reveal what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 April 2007 · Andrew Pulver
35*

Pulver finds the documentary painfully reverent, with a rock-nerd feel that its graphics cannot overcome. He singles out Walker performing Jacques Brel on The Frankie Howerd Show as its most striking moment.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 February 2007 · festival review · Ray Bennett
30*

The critic finds the documentary difficult to take seriously, though it may appeal to pop ironists as parody. He singles out the film’s treatment of Walker’s perfectionism as especially absurd.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
15 July 2007 · Leanne McGrath
85*

The critic calls the documentary an affectionate, thoroughly enjoyable tribute and recommends it to music fans. She praises its entertaining account of Walker’s career and access to his unusual recording process.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate