Critics’ reviews

sex, lies, and videotape (1989)

7 reviews from 7 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of sex, lies, and videotape

3 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
0

With only 3 reviews in so far, the reviews lean warm but the spread is wide. Most critics take it as an unusually assured debut, praising Soderbergh’s script for its patience with adultery and voyeurism, and the performances for feeling like people rather than positions; several single out the video camera itself as a character. Some note the technical limits of a low budget without minding much. The one clear dissent comes from The New Yorker, which grants the film its polish and its knack for tension from small materials but finds it a triangle drama with a minor kink, arriving at platitudes about honesty and feelings.

Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

The critic finds the film startling in its handling of taboo subjects like adultery and voyeurism through 1980s technology, and startlingly competent as a debut that won the Palme d'Or. The believable characters and Soderbergh's intriguingly intellectual script are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
31 July 1989 · Terrence Rafferty
50*

The review describes the film as a smooth, handsome first feature that generates psychological tension from very little, essentially a triangle drama with a minor kink. It ultimately reduces to dubious truisms about honesty and getting in touch with one’s feelings.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 August 1989 · Sheila Benson

The critic calls the film the funniest and saddest American movie in years and possibly the most compelling, praising its elegant revelation of contemporary sexual afflictions and tranquil spell. Soderbergh’s manner of pushing characters into deeper psychological waters is highlighted as a key strength.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 February 1989 · festival review · Duane Byrge

The critic praises the film as a penetrating, moving, and darkly funny independent feature that offers witty but touching insights into modern relationships through its characters' inner workings. They single out the layered performances, particularly those of Peter Gallagher, Andie MacDowell, Laura San Giacomo, and James Spader.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 August 1989 · Caryn James

The critic hails Soderbergh’s debut as an astonishing, richly layered tale of sexual greed, fear, love and betrayal that surpasses its advance praise. Graham’s video camera is singled out as a central player in this intricate dance of truth, self-denial and deception.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 May 2017 · GA

Soderbergh's debut is impressively mature, focusing on the gap between actions and motivations rather than sensationalism. The strong performances and perceptive dialogue make it intellectually and emotionally stimulating.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 July 2014 · Jennie Kermode
80*

The critic calls it a hugely impressive first feature that launched the independent film craze and won the Palme d'Or. She singles out the strong script and performances for praise while noting technical limitations from its low budget.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate