Critics’ reviews

Shallow Grave (1994)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 74: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Shallow Grave

74
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics welcome Shallow Grave as an assured, fast-moving black-comic thriller, with praise clustering around Danny Boyle’s direction, the tightly framed interiors and the lead performances. The reviews find energy and invention in its confined setting, while John Hodge’s screenplay earns credit for keeping the moral dilemma moving towards nastier consequences. Ewan McGregor receives particular attention, and the strongest notices enjoy the characters’ greed and unpleasantness as much as the macabre humour.

The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to mixed responses, with characterisation the main dividing line. RogerEbert.com finds the central trio too unpleasant and boring to sustain involvement, despite flashes of visual style. The Los Angeles Times objects to the sealed-off atmosphere and strained sophistication. Other reservations concern excessive cleverness and a diminishing comic edge as the violence increases: most critics enjoy the film’s sourness, but the dissenters find too little to engage with beyond its technique.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

Danny Boyle's directorial debut is a slick, inventive and at times gruesome movie owing a great deal to the Coen brothers' Blood Simple. It bursts with energy, springs macabre surprises and features wonderful performances from the leads; it gave a much-needed shot in the arm to the British film industry.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
85*

The critic hails Shallow Grave as the best British thriller in years, a chilling and claustrophobic heart-stopper centred on a moral dilemma. They single out the frighteningly realistic characters and relentless pacing that packs a lot into its short runtime.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 May 2024
80*

The critic praises the film's macabre black-comic crime caper as a triple-crossing treat and sour delight, highlighting its cynical take on nasty, greedy characters and the standout early performances, especially Ewan McGregor's.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 February 1995 · Anthony Lane
75*

A smart, stylish Scottish shocker whose visual suavity and formal framing are its greatest strengths, though it is at times too clever for its own good. It is thoroughly modern, quick and enjoyably excessive.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 February 1995 · Roger Ebert
55*

The film has the makings of a respectable modern murder story but never quite gels because the three central characters are too unpleasant and boring to identify with. Boyle shows flashes of style in the body-disposal scenes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 February 1995 · Peter Rainer
50*

A black comedy that turns progressively darker and bloodier as three unpleasant roommates descend into murder and paranoia after finding a corpse and cash. It aspires to class but ends up feeling hermetically sealed and vaguely futuristic rather than enjoyably lowdown.

Read the full review →
The Times
10 May 2024 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher

The review calls it a gritty noir that launched the Brit-film boost of the Nineties, praising its propulsive thrill ride and amoral characters capturing smug materialism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh

The film is an impressively assured and highly accomplished British feature that doesn't dwell on moral niceties but goes straight for the gut. John Hodge's screenplay has unrelenting forward momentum, and Boyle's direction is agile and invigorating even with most action in one flat; as the friends fall out it loses some black comic edge but gains in mayhem.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
75*

The critic praises Danny Boyle's balanced direction of tension and wit in this dark thriller about flatmates who keep a dead lodger's money, highlighting the paranoia and greed revealed. The actors are perfectly matched, though the ending has a note of unintentional absurdity.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate