Most critics like Side Effects, and the praise clusters in two places: Rooney Mara’s lead performance, which several reviews call the glue holding the puzzle together, and Steven Soderbergh’s control as director, cinematographer and editor. Jude Law’s psychiatrist is singled out nearly as often. Reviewers agree on the shape of the film: it opens as a sober drama about depression and prescription drugs, then turns into a twisting, Hitchcockian potboiler, and most find that turn thrilling rather than cheap. The reservations cluster on the third act. Even admiring reviews concede the plotting grows pulpy, and the mixed notices say the late twists undo whatever the film has to say about the pharmaceutical industry. The spread is fairly wide for a well-liked film. The Hollywood Reporter finds the twists too many to convince, The Skinny calls it ludicrous and its critique unlanded, and IndieWire detects fatigue in the execution. Nobody disputes the craft.
G
The Guardian
7 March 2013 · Peter Bradshaw
90*
Soderbergh bids farewell to cinema in style with a gripping psychological thriller about big pharma and mental health. It is a noirish satire elevated by Rooney Mara's compelling lead performance and Soderbergh's elegant, eerie visuals.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
7 March 2013 · Robbie Collin
85*
If this is Soderbergh's final film he goes out on a high. It starts as sober psychological drama and ferments into a queasy, thrilling whodunit that smartly explores prescription-drug culture and moral murk.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
7 February 2013 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83
The critic calls it a vastly entertaining thriller that isn't the message movie it initially appears to be, focusing instead on high-level gamesmanship and duplicity, with Rooney Mara superb as the puzzle's glue.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
7 March 2013 · Nigel Andrews
80*
Soderbergh’s mischievously enthralling thriller mixes paranoia and pharmaceuticals around Rooney Mara's unstable Emily. It is a consummate Hitchcockian trip that loves paranoia while probing mental misfortune and the demon Pharma.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
5 March 2013 · ★★★★ · Ben Walters
80
The review calls it a pacy, sleight-of-hand thriller that works as fun genre entertainment with sly digs at consumerism. It highlights strong performances, technical flair and twists while noting it serves as a fitting swansong for the director.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
6 February 2013 · David Edelstein
80*
The critic praises it as a smooth, shapely suspense picture where Soderbergh is on top of his material, cleverly mixing conventions in a paranoid yet bouncy noir-tinged thriller.
Read the full review →T
The Times
8 March 2013 · Kate Muir
75*
Jude Law oozes obsession and ambiguity as a psychiatrist in Soderbergh's twisting, drug-addled drama. The plot wrongfoots the viewer repeatedly in a story that blends Big Pharma critique with psychological chess.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★ · Stella Papamichael
60
The critic describes an intelligently crafted, briskly paced and suspenseful thriller that highlights flaws in psychiatry, but notes it loses impact with a crude payoff in the third act.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
25 January 2013 · festival review · Ed Gonzalez
60*
The critic notes the film's stylish psychopharmacology thriller elements and clever twists but finds it ultimately square and lacking the courage of its aesthetic convictions in its later stages.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
5 February 2013 · Eric Kohn
40*
The review suggests Soderbergh is ready for a break, portraying the film as showing signs of fatigue in its execution despite its thriller elements.
Read the full review →E
Empire
1 January 2012 · Ian Freer
The critic calls it a grown-up thrill ride that is suspenseful, whip-smart and full of surprises, mutating from a portrait of depression into a gripping Hitchcockian potboiler with strong performances, especially from Jude Law.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
15 April 2013
The critic praises it as a highly watchable Hitchcockian thriller made with persuasive clarity and directness, highlighting Steven Soderbergh's control as director, cinematographer and editor, along with strong turns from Jude Law and Rooney Mara.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
7 February 2013 · Kenneth Turan
The critic praises Soderbergh for bringing intelligence and verve to this straight-ahead twisty adult thriller with a complex plot and cinematic skill that renders implausibility irrelevant. The top-notch cast and production values are highlighted.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
25 January 2013 · festival review
The review finds the film increasingly ludicrous yet nasty fun, ultimately too clever for its own good, but appreciates Soderbergh and the cast's cool confidence if the absurdity is accepted on its own terms.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
8 March 2013 · Trevor Johnston
The critic finds the thriller too slippery and problematic due to excessive narrative twists and contrivances that fail to sustain credibility or purpose. Technical craft, direction and some performances are praised but the overall result is seen as not the right note for Soderbergh's supposed retirement.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
1 February 2013 · Todd McCarthy
The critic finds it a lushly made but unconvincing thriller about the dangers of prescription drugs, undermined by too many plot-twist sucker-punches that elicit an 'Oh, come on' reaction.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
3 February 2013 · David Denby
The critic calls the film an intelligent Soderbergh experiment in form that shifts from downbeat drama to sober Hitchcockian thriller. The precise direction and the way the thriller plot is worked out are noted, though it lacks joy in filmmaking.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
8 February 2013 · A.O. Scott
The critic finds the film a tight, twisty pharma-caper and clever old-fashioned noir potboiler that ultimately concerns lust, jealousy and greed more than medicine. Soderbergh's honesty and skill are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →V
Variety
25 January 2013 · Justin Chang
The critic describes an elegantly coiled puzzler that begins as satire of the pill-popping society and morphs into something different, an absorbing and cunningly unpredictable entertainment. The rapid-fire twists and Soderbergh's assured direction are noted.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
11 February 2013 · Anne-Katrin Titze
80*
Soderbergh crafts a captivating and scrupulously deceiving prescription drug drama that blurs boundaries between worlds and minds. The critic singles out the authentic details and the reactions of supporting female characters to the protagonist's breakdowns for particular praise.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film terrific and entertaining, recommending viewers avoid spoilers to fully enjoy its surprises. They single out the twisty script and Soderbergh's direction for effectively shifting expectations and delivering surprises without cheating the audience.
Read the full review →/
/Film
8 February 2013 · 7.5/10 · Russ Fischer
75
Soderbergh delivers a smart but pessimistic thriller with a winding narrative that keeps predictability at bay and demonstrates razor-sharp precision in storytelling. The critic singles out Rooney Mara and Jude Law's performances, especially Mara's ability to convincingly portray multiple facets of her character's psychoses.
Read the full review →C
Collider
7 February 2013 · C- · Matt Goldberg
50
The critic finds the first half insightful on psychiatric drugs and depression but criticizes the second half for devolving into contrived thriller twists that undermine the earlier themes. Praises Soderbergh's bleary-eyed depiction of emotional numbness.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
7 March 2013 · ★★ · Jamie Dunn
40
A ludicrous thriller disguised as a sociopolitical statement on the pharmaceutical industry that Soderbergh seems embarrassed by. Its plotting and tone are schizophrenic and it fails to land its critique.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
5 March 2013 · 4 out of 5 · James Peaty
Soderbergh delivers a taut, engaging medical thriller with strong performances from Mara and Law that recalls Hitchcock and Polanski. The final act stumbles into pulpy territory but overall it is gripping and entertaining.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
5 March 2013 · 4 · Emma Dibdin
A taut, disciplined paranoid thriller that keeps the audience guessing with justified paranoia and strong turns from Law and Mara. It ultimately has less to say than it initially promises.
Read the full review →P
Paste
15 February 2013 · 8.5 · Scott Wold
Soderbergh enriches the psychological thriller genre with a masterfully spare effort that begins as a heart-wrenching portrait of depression before delivering shocking twists. Singles out Rooney Mara's fantastic performance and the director's fine craftsmanship.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate