Critics’ reviews

Sideways (2004)

12 reviews from 12 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 4 so far.

Back to our review of Sideways

4 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2012 · Dan Jolin
90*

The critic praises Payne and Taylor's script for its sharp observation of flawed, relatable characters and the uniformly excellent performances, especially Paul Giamatti's. Minor flaws like a slight second-act sag do not detract from the wonderful, original result.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Derek Malcom
85*

The critic finds the road movie astonishingly surefooted and the adaptation shrewd, with brilliant casting that makes the flawed leads entirely believable and likeable. Giamatti's performance is singled out as almost beyond praise in this funny and sad character study.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 February 2005 · Mark Salisbury
85*

Payne delivers a full-bodied and winningly downbeat comedy that mixes road-movie and buddy-film conventions with a lighter, more soulful touch than his previous work. The critic singles out the richly drawn, flawed characters and their relatable human foibles for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
28 January 2005 · DC
85*

This low-key road movie grounds mismatched friends and mishaps in serious, intelligent and affecting themes of male crisis and disappointment. The critic highlights Payne's confident restraint in pacing and humour, along with sharp oenophile dialogue, as key strengths.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
15 October 2004

The critic notes Payne's skill as a structuralist filmmaker with pitch-perfect character moments and attractive visuals. He praises the cast but complains about a late contrivance and the director's fondness for cheap jokes.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 October 2004 · Scott Tobias

The critic calls the film a wonderful road comedy that uses wry behavioral observations and wine as a metaphor for life. He singles out Giamatti's performance and the film's ability to blend comedy with emotional resonance and intimacy.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 January 2005 · Peter Bradshaw

This is a glorious, bittersweet comedy of male friendship and midlife crisis, even better than Payne's prior films, and a new classic of American cinema comparable to Cassavetes or Ashby. The critic singles out the beautifully written and acted observations, sight gags, and exquisite sadness that give the film its emotional power.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 September 2004 · Kirk Honeycutt

The critic praises the film as a hysterically funny yet melancholy comedy with a beautiful structure, buoyant romance, and tight control of subtext. He highlights the strong pairing of Giamatti and Church and the effective use of the wine country setting.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
18 October 2004 · David Denby

The critic calls the film wonderful and Payne's largest, most candid work, a comedy poised at the edge of despair. It singles out the sensual pleasure taken in wine-tasting scenes and the scathing intimacy of the two male friends.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 October 2004 · festival review · Manohla Dargis

The critic praises the film as a heart-piercing story of a disappointed man whose struggles make him decent and good. It singles out the director's skill with actors and the central performance by Paul Giamatti.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 September 2004

The critic hails the film as wonderful and accomplished, restoring humanism to American films with its beautifully observed study of personal foibles and romantic uncertainty. It singles out the exceptional performances, especially Giamatti's nuanced portrayal of the depressive Miles.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 January 2005 · Angus Wolfe Murray

The critic praises the film's intelligent writing and sublime performances, especially from Paul Giamatti and Thomas Haden Church, as two friends embark on a wine-country road trip. Payne is commended for remaining loyal to his characters without mocking or overly praising them.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate