Critics’ reviews

Sin City (2005)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 72: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Sin City

72
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics respond positively to Sin City, with praise concentrated on its black-and-white imagery, selective splashes of colour and digital recreation of Frank Miller’s comics. The reviews repeatedly admire how closely Rodriguez and Miller reproduce the source’s look, even when they question what that fidelity achieves. Performances also earn approval, particularly Mickey Rourke’s, while the film’s stylised violence and hard-boiled atmosphere appeal most strongly to reviewers receptive to pulp noir.

Reservations cluster around repetitive revenge stories, thin characterisation and violence that becomes wearing rather than dramatic. The central disagreement concerns fidelity: some find it inventive, while Little White Lies admires the visual achievement but argues that reproducing the panels so rigidly prevents the film from working as cinema. The spread is broadly positive but not uniform, with The Guardian offering the clearest rejection, finding the monochrome style insufficient compensation for borrowed ideas and a lack of human depth.

Empire
3 June 2005 · Kim Newman
85*

The critic praises the film's extreme fidelity to Frank Miller's source material and its striking black-and-white visuals with selective colour splashes. Rodriguez's direction is called his best work yet, delivering a treat for fans of stylish, violent noir.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
3 June 2005 · 4/4/1 · Matt Bochenski
80

Sin City is a dazzling collision of art and violence but is hamstrung by its rigid faithfulness to the source material. It is a bold transliteration of the comic rather than a true adaptation, ultimately unsuccessful as cinema because it cannot replicate the stillness and unique power of the panels.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sloan Freer
80

Frank Miller's hard-boiled comic book comes to spectacular life in this collaboration with Rodriguez, meticulously recreating three interlinked neo-noir stories in black and white with splashes of colour. Stylistically a masterpiece with astonishing visuals, it papers over a repetitious plot and corny dialogue, suiting genre fans best.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
29 March 2005
80*

Rodriguez delivers one of the most unremittingly bleak-hearted slices of noir pulp drama ever committed to film, a wildly imaginative black-and-white comic come to life that enthralled Miller devotees and newcomers alike. The film drags somewhat toward the end but its originality, verve and Rourke's standout performance compensate.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 June 2005 · Kim Newman
75*

Rodriguez and Miller deliver a strikingly faithful comic-book adaptation that captures the source's adolescent hardboiled fantasies with visual flair and stylisation. The film excels in its monochrome aesthetic and performances but embraces a simplistic, confrontational morality without depth or variation in tone.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2005 · Keith Phipps
75*

The critic praises the film's faithful upload of Frank Miller's comics into a visually striking hybrid of live-action and CGI that redefines ultraviolence and captures the source's terse pulp poetry and oversized themes of guilt and vengeance. They note some overload from the cumulative excess and that certain black humor does not translate as smoothly, but overall commend the ambitious, inventive pastiche that creates a queasily intoxicating new world.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 April 2005 · Manohla Dargis
70*

The critic calls the film a slavishly faithful screen adaptation of Frank Miller's comics that tracks tough guys and dolls from pulp fiction in a permanent midnight world with intermittent color. It praises the visual style and strong performances such as Mickey Rourke's while noting the repetitive violence and limited character depth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
31 May 2005 · BW
70*

The film marks a new watershed in CGI filmmaking through its astonishing fidelity to Miller's graphic novels and slickly meshed digital environments. Its Pulp Fiction-style structure and repetitive revenge narratives pummel home the same points relentlessly, though the exceptional monochrome look with vivid colour accents remains a highlight.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 March 2005 · Todd McCarthy
65*

The review describes an aggressively faithful rendering of the comic book aesthetic as a Mickey Spillane fever dream that delivers for action fans and geeks but locks the material into a live-action cartoon. It singles out the dazzling visuals, Rourke's ferocious comeback performance, and the score for praise while criticizing the episodic structure and violence substituting for drama.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 June 2005 · Peter Bradshaw
40*

The film is a flagrant pulp noir fantasy with visually striking monochrome style and lurid colour accents, but it lacks originality and human dimensions, feeling like a borrowed imitation of comic-book source material.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
4 June 2005 · ★★★½ · Angus Wolfe Murray
70

The critic finds the stories shallow with the depth of graffiti and cluttered with clunky lines, but praises the striking monochrome comic-book visuals and advises viewers to let the visuals seduce them rather than overthink the plot.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate