The reviews are uniformly favourable and the spread is narrow: nobody dislikes it, and the argument is only over how much to like it. Praise clusters around Ryan Coogler’s nerve in stacking a 1932 Mississippi period drama, a vampire film and a blues musical into a single night, and around his ability to hold the pile together. Michael B. Jordan’s dual role is singled out repeatedly, as are the juke joint musical sequences, Ludwig Göransson’s score and the 70mm photography, with several critics also noting Miles Caton’s debut. The reservations are consistent too. Most critics find the film overstuffed, and a few think the change of gear into pulpy horror costs it something: Time Out calls the shift jarring, NME finds the final act stop-start, Vulture argues it never quite works as horror, and the Financial Times, the coolest of the group at three stars, reads the genre collision as a loss of nerve rather than a show of it.
N
The New York Times
17 April 2025 · Manohla Dargis
90*
The critic calls it a genre-defying, mind-bending fantasia overflowing with great performances, dancing vampires, and ideas about love and history. She singles out the blues musician's role as a time traveler connecting generations.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
10 April 2025 · ★★★★ · Clarisse Loughrey
80
The critic praises the film's inventive fusion of historical epic, horror and action as a bold original idea in a sickly cinema landscape. They single out the electric genre-mashing and strong supporting cast for praise.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
18 April 2025 · Christina Newland
80*
The critic calls it one of the most satisfying and fun blockbusters of the year, praising its blend of supernatural horror with political and historical themes. They single out the evocative atmosphere, strong performances and genre-bending story.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
10 April 2025 · ★★★★ · Elizabeth Weitzman
80
The critic finds Coogler's film an audacious epic packing multiple genres into one day in 1932 Mississippi, with stunning settings, stirring music and electric party scenes. The shift to pulpy vampire horror feels somewhat jarring and cumbersome after the rich world-building.
Read the full review →E
Empire
15 April 2025 · Helen O’Hara
75*
The critic describes it as a wildly original, defiantly weird and gorgeously made film that twists the vampire myth into something thematically dense. They single out the world-building, performances and idiosyncratic take on colonialist vampires.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
10 April 2025
75*
The critic describes an ambitious melding of pop spectacle and serious intent that has much to say about race and class divisions, with expertly staged fright sequences. The picture is overstuffed at times but consistently engaging thanks to its pulpy action and thematic points.
Read the full review →V
Variety
10 April 2025 · Owen Gleiberman
75*
It is a vibrant, richly acted portrait of a 1930s Deep South community that works more than it does not as a lavishly serious popcorn movie about the wages of sin in Black America. The critic singles out Michael B. Jordan's subtle dual performance and the community scenes for praise while noting it can feel overloaded.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
17 April 2025 · ★★★☆☆ · Danny Leigh
Ryan Coogler follows his Black Panther success with an audacious genre mash-up of period gangster/vampire movie with musical flourishes. Amid the audacity of genres colliding as fangs find necks, it feels like a loss of nerve.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
17 April 2025 · ★★★★☆
The critic calls it a sweltering, swaggering studio movie that is relentlessly entertaining while giving audiences plenty to chew on. It is described as a messy, muscular mash-up of historical drama, horror and action that delivers a righteous, rollicking good time.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
19 April 2025
Ryan Coogler’s film is a wild, untrammelled and thrillingly unpredictable sexy southern gothic horror and blues-infused vampire flick. Coogler’s assurance and vision holds the messy story threads together, with phenomenal 70mm visuals and a hot-headed, dangerous soundtrack.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
10 April 2025 · David Rooney
The critic praises Coogler's ambitious, genre-blending horror film with strong performances, visuals, and music, calling it a unique experience that works despite its mix of elements. Praises the sensuality, cinematography, and music.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film bold and ambitious with deep reverence for the Black South and strong characters, but it misses greatness due to overambition, misshapen story, and failure as visceral horror. Praises the sensuality and celebration of the South.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
10 April 2025 · A-
90
Coogler remixes classic vampire tropes with fresh musical flair, group consciousness, and cultural commentary centered on spirituality and traditions. The result is a thrilling, fun, and scary roller-coaster ride that confirms his talent for reinventing genres in an original story.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
10 April 2025 · Siddhant Adlakha
90*
The film is a heady, complicated movie with Jordan Peele-level ambition and subtext that holds together despite its abundance of tones and influences. It stands as a major swing for big-budget genre cinema and a deeply personal work, with strengths far outweighing its flaws.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
29 April 2025 · Lex Pryor
85*
Sinners is a bluesy Southern gothic nestled in late-night vampire pulp that serves as a love letter to both a form and a subject, devoted to building on its inspirations while keeping things funky, freaky, and entertaining. It is a stunning, entrancing, spooky work with rough edges but immense cultural resonance.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
19 April 2025 · David Crow
80*
The critic views the film as a profound American tragedy exploring cultural appropriation, racial oppression, and the blues' roots through vampire mythology and historical context. It singles out the juke joint musical sequences and the reclamation of Black humanity and heritage for praise.
Read the full review →N
NME
16 April 2025 · ★★★★ · James Mottram
80
The critic praises Coogler's imaginative blend of blues, horror, and period drama, highlighting the standout musical sequences and Ludwig Göransson's score as the film's strongest elements. The final act is noted as uneven and stop-start, failing to fully integrate its disparate parts.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
10 April 2025 · Pete Hammond
The critic calls it a devilishly entertaining period vampire movie/blues musical/Deep South gangster flick that marches to its own drum. He singles out Coogler's exceptional original filmmaking, the technically and performatively strong dual role for Jordan, the knockout musical score incorporating the African blues songbook, and standout turns from the ensemble cast including Miles Caton's sensational debut.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate