Critics’ reviews

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut (1999)

9 reviews from 9 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

3 of 6
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
75*

The film is surprisingly agreeable and provides plenty of comic moments that suggest the franchise could work in movie form. The clever plot delivers sideswipes at censorship and other targets, along with perky musical numbers, though some scatological subplots drag on too long.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 June 1999 · Roger Ebert
65*

Ebert finds the film a vicious social satire that delivers the year's sharpest political commentary through its obscene animated comedy, though he is often offended by its content. He singles out the bedroom scenes between Satan and Saddam Hussein as particularly noteworthy.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 June 1999 · John Anderson

Anderson describes the film as gleefully vulgar and eagerly offensive, finding it tough not to enjoy despite its flaws. He singles out its cleverness in skewering intolerance and the movie morality debate, with the kids saving the world from Saddam Hussein.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Leslie Felperin

The critic praises the film's timely satire on censorship, politics, media, xenophobia and more, calling it tighter and more focused than the TV series and a strong musical. A minor complaint is made about one negligible character.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 August 1999 · Andrew Pulver

The film is the most impressively vicious and nasty-minded film satire of the year, capitalizing on its freedom from TV censorship with 140 F-words and clever self-referential story ideas. It strains after an hour with flailing sight gags but its central message about blaming cultural products for social ills shines through.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 June 1999 · Stephen Holden

Holden calls the film very funny and extremely obscene, praising its rock-bottom third-grade humor clashing with adult sanctimony as the source of many laughs. He highlights its Disney-style musical numbers that parody everything from Rodgers and Hammerstein to Les Misérables.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 March 2014 · TCh

The critic praises the first half-hour's low-aiming but effective below-the-belt satire on the censorship brigade and various targets. It notes the film cannot sustain its outrageous energy for the full runtime.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 June 1999 · Dennis Harvey

Harvey praises the film for bringing the objectionable tykes to the screen with considerable aplomb and clever diversion. He singles out the expanded musical interludes, from parodies to fully orchestrated rude ditties, as a highlight.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · ★★★ · Angus Wolfe Murray
60

The critic praises Trey Parker's irreverent dismantling of institutional pomposity and political correctness through sharp, profane dialogue and deceptively simple animation that outdoes The Simpsons. They single out the satirical plot of kids sparking a war with Canada over a forbidden movie and the film's wicked one-liners that mock adults while celebrating free speech and irreverence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate