Critics’ reviews

Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 44: 1 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace

44
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
3

The consensus leans towards disappointment, though the reviews find reasons to admire the spectacle. Praise clusters around the creation of other worlds, the effects and individual action sequences, especially the lightsaber duel. Even several sceptical accounts find these passages impressive. The recurring complaint is that the technical work serves a story short on warmth, engaging characters and dramatic momentum; performances attract little enthusiasm, while exposition repeatedly slows the adventure.

The spread is wide, and the visuals themselves divide critics. Slant Magazine sees digital clutter and weightless action where more sympathetic reviews find invention. Reservations also gather around childish humour, character stereotypes and the sense that merchandising takes precedence over storytelling. Total Film offers a clear counterview, enjoying the film as light family escapism despite its limitations. The Telegraph is more emphatic, praising the adventure storytelling and visual imagination that other critics find missing.

Total Film
15 July 1999
75*

The review calls it fantastic, fluffy family escapism that delivers on hype for fun and spectacle while noting it falls short of being a masterpiece and is not quite as strong as the original trilogy’s best entries.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Colin Kennedy
55*

The critic finds the film flawed by excessive exposition, slow pacing, poor child acting and an ill-conceived young Anakin, yet praises the production design on Coruscant, the lightsaber duel and Qui-Gon’s story arc as redeeming features.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
30 November 2014 · Frank Scheck
40*

The review finds the film a brilliant technical achievement in effects and set pieces but a less emotionally resonant exercise that prioritizes merchandising over meaningful storytelling. It singles out the dazzling visuals and action sequences for praise while faulting the underdeveloped screenplay, silly humor, and lack of compelling characters or villain.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1999 · Andrew O'Hehir
30*

The critic finds the film a lost opportunity, criticizing its leaden visuals, laboured narrative full of expository dialogue, and problematic character stereotypes while noting some impressive action sequences like the lightsaber duel.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 February 2012 · Calum Marsh
10*

The review deems the film a cold, lifeless, and visually cluttered disaster whose digital excesses overwhelm any sense of wonder or style, resulting in incoherent action and infantile elements. It singles out the relentless visual busyness and ridiculous gags like Jar Jar Binks for particular complaint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 May 1999 · Kenneth Turan

The film is a considerable letdown lacking warmth and humor, though it has visual strengths in creating other worlds. It is serviceable but ponderous and not particularly interesting dramatically.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 July 1999 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic finds the film a boring disappointment that treats audiences like consumers rather than engaging them with story or characters. It singles out the uniformly poor acting and over-reliance on FX and merchandise for complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 May 1999 · Janet Maslin

The critic finds the film a happy surprise that sustains the series' gee-whiz spirit with impressive illusions and backdrops. Human characters are upstaged by the visual spectacle and imaginative creatures.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
15 July 1999 · Andrew O'Hagan

The critic praises the film as one of the most deliriously inventive in years, highlighting George Lucas's genius for adventure narrative and calling it daring and beautiful. It singles out the wide-eyed magic and finished quality of the movie for praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
8 February 2012 · ★★★ · N P
60

The critic finds the film mostly boring with a first-draft screenplay and cartoonish CGI effects that lack weight, and singles out Jar Jar as offensively bad. They praise the pod race set piece, sound design, John Williams score, and the epic Duel of the Fates lightsaber battle as spectacular highlights.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate