Critics’ reviews

Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 40: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 11 negative.

Back to our review of Star Wars: The Clone Wars

40
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
11

Most critics find The Clone Wars a thin piece of work, and the reviews lean negative: eleven of sixteen are unfavourable. Where there is praise it lands almost entirely on the animation and the action. Several critics admire the stylised CG and the scale of the set pieces, with Empire singling out a vertical firefight as the film’s best sequence. Nearly everyone notes that it plays like an extended television pilot; the kinder reviews take that as a fair description rather than a failing.

The reservations cluster on the writing. Critics complain of stiff, repetitive dialogue, characters with no inner life, and a plot about rescuing Jabba’s infant son that most consider beneath the saga. Roger Ebert and others liken it to a Saturday-morning cartoon. The spread is narrow at the bottom, with most scores between 20 and 40. Only The Times and Empire recommend it, while Time Out concedes that Ziro the Hutt is the one reason to watch.

The Times
16 August 2008 · Ed Potton
75*

The review praises the film's stylised CGI animation and kinetic action sequences as an improvement in energy over the prequels. It highlights the broader cartoon style and impressive set pieces while noting concessions to animated conventions.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 August 2008 · James Dyer
70*

An enjoyable escapade and solid introduction to the upcoming TV series, though it feels more like television than a proper cinematic Star Wars film. The critic singles out the inventive vertical firefight sequence for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 August 2008 · C+ · Tasha Robinson
63

The film feels like a videogame with repetitive battles and a talky focus on juvenile relationships; Ahsoka is a welcome addition but overall it lacks reason to be on the big screen.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 August 2008
55*

Action-packed and visually impressive with photorealistic backdrops and solid light-sabre sequences, the CG-animated feature still feels like a supercharged TV pilot for the associated series. The animation is its biggest asset, though characters are less naturalistic and the story serves mainly to build buzz for the TV launch.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 August 2008 · Nathan Lee
50*

The critic notes that low expectations from prior prequels make the film a mild surprise as it avoids being the worst movie of the year, praising its uncluttered look and pace as a mechanical thrill ride while criticizing its stiff characterizations and lack of credible human feeling.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 August 2008 · Tom Huddleston
40*

The film is a flimsy, kid-friendly videogame approximation of the Star Wars franchise, packed with bizarre distractions like the new Padawan Ahsoka and the burping Hutt son Stinky. Ziro the Hutt stands out as the most preposterous yet best reason to watch, making it at least better than The Phantom Menace.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 August 2008 · Michael Ordona
30*

The critic calls the film a weak effort aimed too low, with gorgeous animation undermined by poor writing, repetitious dialogue, and a nonsensical plot involving Jabba the Hutt's baby, concluding the Force is not strong with this one.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 August 2008 · Roger Ebert
30*

The critic finds the film a disappointing reduction of the Star Wars saga to Saturday-morning cartoon level, with poor animation quality, simplistic dialogue, and a plot that feels repetitive and uninspired.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 August 2008 · Michael Rechtshaffen
30*

The critic views it as a stiffly executed CG feature that serves mainly as a promo for the upcoming TV series, with limited innovation and lifeless dialogue despite some eye-catching sequences.

Read the full review →
The Independent
16 August 2008
30*

A minor release best subtitled 'Wait for the DVD,' essentially a pilot for the TV series that won't hold up as a standalone film. Primary school-age fans may enjoy the action, but the animation and story are criticised as below par even for Star Wars.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 August 2008
20*

The critic finds the plot inconsequential and the action sequences brain-numbing, with grating banter between Anakin and Ahsoka plus script jaggedness undermining any visual strengths.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 August 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
20*

The critic finds the film a pointless cash-in extension of the Star Wars prequels with uninteresting subject matter and lifeless CGI characters. The review questions why George Lucas continues to produce more Star Wars content instead of something new.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
26 August 2008 · ★★ · Ron Hogan
40

The critic finds the film flat and underwhelming as a big-screen event, stitched together from TV episodes with little steam or fizz, though not quite as bad as The Phantom Menace. It singles out the weak overall execution and lack of excitement in the story of rescuing Stinky the Hutt.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 August 2008 · Ben Sillis
30*

The critic finds the film feels like a Saturday morning cartoon aimed at kids, lacking depth and character development, though praises the distinctive CGI animation.

Read the full review →
Paste
21 August 2008 · Paste Staff
30*

The critic finds the film visually unappealing with outdated stylized CGI and a simplistic children's plot lacking any real threat or depth, rendering it tedious despite action scenes.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 March 2026 · Billy Fellows
10*

The critic argues that the 2008 film is poorly structured as a set of disjointed episodes with clunky animation and underdeveloped early character dynamics between Anakin and Ahsoka.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate