Critics’ reviews

Star Wars (1977)

10 reviews from 10 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 2 so far.

Back to our review of Star Wars

2 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
2
Sight and Sound
1 November 1977 · Richard Combs
40*

The critic views the film as a phenomenon that has become difficult to assess objectively, describing it as monumentally empty and more an exercise in audience programming and nostalgia than a substantive work with ideas. It draws on various movie tropes and serials but lacks emotional resonance, philosophical depth or the transformative qualities of true science fiction.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Terry Curtis Fox
20*

The critic finds Star Wars totally inept and mindless, defeating serious consideration as a film. He singles out the film's failure to deliver on promised payoffs in its action sequences and its lack of depth or innovation in storytelling and characters.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 May 1977 · Charles Champlin

Champlin hails it as the year's most razzle-dazzling family movie and an exuberant, technically astonishing space adventure. He singles out the production design, special effects, and its roots in westerns and Flash Gordon serials.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 May 1977 · Roger Ebert

Ebert praises the film as a magical experience that transports viewers to a galaxy far away with whimsy, fantasy, and sophisticated storytelling. He singles out the wealth of strange living creatures and special effects for making the universe feel alive and inventive.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 December 1977 · Derek Malcolm

The critic finds the film gives two hours of joy and plays enough games to satisfy sophisticated viewers, while noting it is not an improvement on Lucas's previous work except in box-office terms and lacks originality.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
25 May 1977 · Ron Pennington

The critic calls the film magnificent in scope with an effective human element from the script and performances, combining comedy and drama with exciting action and spectacular special effects that make it a potential classic. The adorable robot characters (C-3PO and R2-D2) are singled out for praise as two of the most endearing ever in a film.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 June 1977

The review finds the film exuberantly entertaining and dazzling in its mix of futurism and long-held faith. It singles out the robot couple as out of Beckett or vaudeville and the spacecraft battles for their fiery effect.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 May 1977 · Vincent Canby

Canby calls it the most elaborate, most expensive, most beautiful movie serial ever made and an apotheosis of Flash Gordon serials. He singles out the fun and funny tone, the robots as the year's best new comedy team, and the special effects and design.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
16 December 1977 · Adrian Berry

The critic calls it the best such film since 2001 and one of the most exciting ever made, praising its unpretentious story, impressive effects, and convincing realism in most respects.

Read the full review →
The Times
16 December 1977 · David Robinson

The critic praises the film's restoration of brightly defined characters, a hurtling story, confident fantasy world with advanced effects, and genuine escapism that requires no connections to real worlds.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate