Film review

Star Wars

1977 · Directed by George Lucas · 2h 01m · MPA PG

In a sentenceAll those spacecraft, and we would happily spend the evening with the two robots

AdventureActionScience Fiction

Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) receives his father’s lightsaber from Obi-Wan Kenobi (Alec Guinness). His journey takes him into the Mos Eisley cantina, in a galaxy shared by Han Solo (Harrison Ford), Princess Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher) and Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew). The robots C-3PO (Anthony Daniels) and R2-D2 (Kenny Baker) provide a running double act, while David Prowse and James Earl Jones supply the body and voice of Darth Vader. George Lucas writes and directs a space adventure that draws on westerns and serials, with strange creatures and spacecraft battles.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

George Lucas’s space adventure is funny, exciting and easy to follow, with creatures and machinery worth a closer look. A few stiff exchanges are a small price for such well-managed fun.

Star Wars is a thoroughly enjoyable adventure, and George Lucas is sensible enough to give its pleasures room to work. He writes and directs a film of western and serial ingredients: plainly defined characters, strange creatures, spacecraft and a story that keeps moving. At 121 minutes, it could have become a long introduction to an elaborate fictional history. Instead, there is usually something funny to watch, something unfamiliar to inspect or a piece of action with an intelligible purpose.

The early business with Luke Skywalker receiving his father’s lightsaber from Obi-Wan Kenobi gives the adventure an immediate personal connection. Mark Hamill makes Luke’s eagerness likeable, even when the writing leaves him little beyond it to play. Alec Guinness gives Obi-Wan an authority that helps the film get away with some solemn dialogue. Lucas does not develop these people much beyond their readily understood roles, and the exchanges can occasionally sound like actors explaining the story to one another.

The comic life is stronger, particularly in C-3PO and R2-D2, played by Anthony Daniels and Kenny Baker. We laughed at the robots more than we expected; the pleasure comes from treating such unlikely figures as an ordinary double act, with time allowed for their contrasting responses. Their company makes the galaxy feel inhabited without another explanation. Harrison Ford’s Han Solo and Carrie Fisher’s Princess Leia also help keep the human side lively, rather than merely dutiful.

John Barry’s production design is a substantial part of that appeal, giving the spacecraft and the wider galaxy enough detail to reward attention. The Mos Eisley cantina is a place worth looking around even before Luke has done anything in it. Gilbert Taylor photographs the creatures and machinery with enough clarity for their oddness to register. The effects and strange creatures belong in the same film as the actors; there is a welcome confidence in letting them share our attention.

Richard Chew, Paul Hirsch and Marcia Lucas give the action a pace that feels brisk without becoming exhausting. Their editing preserves the simple question of what each character is trying to do, a useful discipline when spacecraft and effects threaten to take over. John Williams’s score supplies the emotional conviction that Lucas’s dialogue sometimes struggles to find. It can be insistent, but its directness suits a film whose pleasures depend on being caught up in events.

The scored consensus disagrees with us, though it rests on two hostile reviews and the other notices are largely enthusiastic. The complaint about thin characters is fair; the suggestion that the adventure does not work is harder to accept. We think that verdict undervalues the robots’ comedy and the clarity of the action, which do much of the work the character writing leaves undone.

The western and serial traditions give Lucas a workable shape for a galaxy that could otherwise take hours to explain. Science fiction can ask more difficult questions than this, and anyone looking for that should make another choice. Watch it for the adventure, and do not feel obliged to take the solemn dialogue as seriously as the characters do.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
2
Sight and Sound
1 November 1977 · Richard Combs
40*

The critic views the film as a phenomenon that has become difficult to assess objectively, describing it as monumentally empty and more an exercise in audience programming and nostalgia than a substantive work with ideas. It draws on various movie tropes and serials but lacks emotional resonance, philosophical depth or the transformative qualities of true science fiction.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Terry Curtis Fox
20*

The critic finds Star Wars totally inept and mindless, defeating serious consideration as a film. He singles out the film's failure to deliver on promised payoffs in its action sequences and its lack of depth or innovation in storytelling and characters.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 May 1977 · Charles Champlin

Champlin hails it as the year's most razzle-dazzling family movie and an exuberant, technically astonishing space adventure. He singles out the production design, special effects, and its roots in westerns and Flash Gordon serials.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 May 1977 · Roger Ebert

Ebert praises the film as a magical experience that transports viewers to a galaxy far away with whimsy, fantasy, and sophisticated storytelling. He singles out the wealth of strange living creatures and special effects for making the universe feel alive and inventive.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 December 1977 · Derek Malcolm

The critic finds the film gives two hours of joy and plays enough games to satisfy sophisticated viewers, while noting it is not an improvement on Lucas's previous work except in box-office terms and lacks originality.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
25 May 1977 · Ron Pennington

The critic calls the film magnificent in scope with an effective human element from the script and performances, combining comedy and drama with exciting action and spectacular special effects that make it a potential classic. The adorable robot characters (C-3PO and R2-D2) are singled out for praise as two of the most endearing ever in a film.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

BAFTA Film Awards, 1979

Won
Best Original Music

Academy Awards, 1978

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Won
Best Costume Design
Won
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Original Score
Won
Best Production Design
Won
Best Sound
Won
Best Visual Effects

Golden Globes, 1978

Won
Best Original Score

Grammy Award for Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media, 1978

Won
Grammy Award for Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media

Hugo Awards, 1978

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

Saturn Awards, 1978

Won
Best Costume
Won
Best Director
Won
Best Make-up
Won
Best Music
Won
Best Science Fiction Film
Won
Best Set Decoration
Won
Best Special Effects
Won
Best Supporting Actor
Won
Best Writing

Special Achievement Academy Award, 1977

Won
Special Achievement Academy Award

If you liked this, try…

The Hidden Fortress poster

The Hidden Fortress

1958 · Bickering companions give another grand adventure some welcome human irritation.

The Thief of Bagdad poster

The Thief of Bagdad

1940 · For handmade wonders, brisk adventure and a world worth getting lost in.

Castle in the Sky poster

Castle in the Sky

1986 · Another airborne adventure where machinery has character and friendship matters.

The Fifth Element poster

The Fifth Element

1997 · A crowded future with room for daft jokes and colourful oddities.

Galaxy Quest poster

Galaxy Quest

1999 · Space adventure with affectionate jokes and enough peril to make them count.