Film review

Return of the Jedi

1983 · Directed by Richard Marquand · 2h 12m · MPA PG

In a sentenceThe creatures get better parts than the lovers

AdventureActionScience Fiction

An encounter with Jabba opens an adventure in which Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) faces a rancor, while Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher) have their own romance to negotiate. Darth Vader is played by David Prowse and voiced by James Earl Jones, with Ian McDiarmid as the Emperor. Billy Dee Williams plays Lando Calrissian, Anthony Daniels is C-3PO and Peter Mayhew is Chewbacca. Richard Marquand directs this science-fiction adventure from a screenplay by George Lucas and Lawrence Kasdan.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Richard Marquand’s space adventure is good fun when it gives its creatures and chases room. Mark Hamill supplies the conviction, but the thin romance and overindulged Ewoks make this a less brisk evening than it should be.

Return of the Jedi is good adventure filmmaking with some awkward stretches between the adventures. Richard Marquand is trying to bring a trilogy to a satisfying close while keeping its appetite for creatures, chases and jokes, and the competing demands sometimes show. George Lucas and Lawrence Kasdan’s screenplay has more confidence in immediate danger than in getting everyone from one episode to the next. At 132 minutes, it can feel leisurely in places where a little impatience would have helped.

The opening encounter with Jabba gives the film something worth lingering over. Fred Hole, Norman Reynolds and James L. Schoppe’s production design makes these surroundings worth inspecting, and the creatures reward the attention even when the story pauses. We were tense when Luke faced the rancor; having one creature to worry about made the danger immediate. Hamill’s seriousness helps the encounter hold our attention without making the adventure feel solemn.

Hamill is a considerable asset throughout, giving Luke enough conviction to keep us interested when the writing becomes ordinary. John Williams’s score supports that performance by giving Luke’s danger emotional weight as well as excitement. The music encourages us to care about what happens to him, rather than simply wait for the next action sequence. Ian McDiarmid’s Emperor and Darth Vader, played by David Prowse and voiced by James Earl Jones, give the film a stronger dramatic focus than its romance.

That romance is a disappointment, chiefly because Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher have so little convincing writing to work with as Han and Leia. Lucas and Kasdan ask us to care about the relationship without making its exchanges especially interesting. The performances cannot quite disguise how slight those scenes are, though Ford and Fisher remain welcome company. Those conversations are among the stretches we would happily shorten, especially when the film has already demonstrated how much it can do with a creature and a predicament.

The action offers better reasons to stay. Alan Hume and Alec Mills’s cinematography helps give the speeder-bike chase a convincing sense of danger, and the effects make its speed exciting without requiring much explanation. Editors Duwayne Dunham, Sean Barton and Marcia Lucas keep individual passages lively, but their work cannot make the jumps between episodes feel natural. The Ewoks are the clearest test of patience: their appeal to children is easy to understand, yet the time spent with them repeatedly slows the adventure.

As a space adventure, this has enough strange creatures and exciting action to be worth its slower stretches. Most critics disagree with us, finding the story thin and the action tiring; we think they undervalue the suspense of the rancor encounter and the invention around Jabba. The uneven storytelling matters, but it does not make those sequences any less enjoyable. Give it an evening if creatures and chases are your sort of thing, with some patience reserved for the dialogue.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

54
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
3

The reviews are divided on Return of the Jedi, though praise repeatedly centres on its special effects, creatures and action sequences. Jabba and the speeder bike chase draw particular approval, while the more enthusiastic critics find a satisfying conclusion to the trilogy that retains its sense of fun. The Los Angeles Times sees inventiveness and maturity alongside that entertainment value. Even some less persuaded reviews admire the technical work, without finding the storytelling equally convincing.

Reservations cluster around uneven pacing, thin plotting and the emphasis on the Ewoks, whose appeal is often associated with younger viewers. The spread is wide: what supporters find satisfying, detractors regard as a tired repetition of earlier adventures. The New York Times finds little narrative momentum and considers the battles tiresome, while The New Yorker disputes even the film’s visual imagination and finds it emotionally empty. There is no firm agreement that spectacle compensates for the weaknesses.

Los Angeles Times
25 May 1983 · Sheila Benson
90*

The film is fully satisfying and gives honest value, with a sense of closing the circle. It bursts with new inventiveness and maturity while retaining its sense of fun.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This is called essential viewing as the trilogy's strong conclusion, with a strong opening Jabba sequence and effective Vader climax. The critic notes the plot's stop-start nature and that Ewoks particularly appeal to younger audiences.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Christopher Hemblade
65*

The critic views it as the weakest entry in the original trilogy, anodyne compared to The Empire Strikes Back with excessive focus on the Ewoks. They praise the superior special effects including the speeder bike chase and the satisfying dramatic redemption of Darth Vader.

Read the full review →
Time Out
★★★ · SGr
60

The review notes the film's confusing narrative shifts and questions whether Lucas should explore new territory. It praises the impressive effects, creatures like Jabba, and appeal to younger viewers despite tonal inconsistencies.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 May 1983 · Vincent Canby
30*

The film brings the trilogy to a dead stop and is by far the dimmest adventure of the lot. The narrative line is virtually nonexistent and the battle scenes become tiresome.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
3 June 1983 · Patrick Gibbs
30*

The third Star Wars film fails to match the originality of its predecessors and comes across as a whole as slight. The dialogue and performances in the romantic subplot between Leia and Solo are especially weak and laughable.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1984

Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing

Hugo Awards, 1984

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

Saturn Awards, 1984

Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

The Adventures of Robin Hood poster

The Adventures of Robin Hood

1938 · A swashbuckling adventure with clear stakes, brisk action and room for romance.

The Hidden Fortress poster

The Hidden Fortress

1958 · Bickering companions and dangerous travel give this adventure its humour and momentum.

The Dark Crystal poster

The Dark Crystal

1982 · For those who find the creatures more interesting than the humans.

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind poster

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind

1984 · Strange creatures and aerial adventure, with more curiosity about the supposed enemy.

Galaxy Quest poster

Galaxy Quest

1999 · Space adventure that lets its affectionate jokes coexist with danger worth caring about.