Film review

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith

2005 · Directed by George Lucas · 2h 20m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceEveryone in the galaxy is in a meeting except Ian McDiarmid, who is having the time of his life

AdventureActionScience Fiction

The Clone Wars are ending. Above the city-planet Coruscant, Jedi Knights Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) fly into a battle to rescue Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid), who has been kidnapped by the Separatists and is held aboard a flagship where Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) is waiting for them. Back on Coruscant, Anakin’s secret wife, Senator Padmé Amidala (Natalie Portman), tells him she is pregnant. Palpatine, who has held emergency powers since the war began, appoints Anakin his personal representative on the Jedi Council; the Council, led by Mace Windu (Samuel L. Jackson) and Yoda (voice of Frank Oz), refuses him the rank of Master and asks him instead to spy on the Chancellor. Anakin is caught between the men who raised him and the one who flatters him.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The last of Lucas’s prequels is the only one that works, and it works late. The first ninety minutes are meetings and love scenes written by a man who dislikes both; the final forty are opera, and they almost pay for the rest.

George Lucas has one job left in Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, and it is the job the prequels were sold on in 1999: turn a decent young man into Darth Vader and a republic into an empire, in 140 minutes, for an audience that knows exactly where this ends. He gets there. The final forty minutes are the strongest in any Star Wars film since The Empire Strikes Back (1980). The hundred before them are the prequels as we have come to know them, only with more meetings.

It opens well. David Tattersall’s camera follows two fighters in a single long swoop across a battle above Coruscant, through a wall of ships and gunfire, and for a few minutes the film has the pulp speed of 1977. Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) bicker, board a flagship and find Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) waiting for them. Gavin Bocquet’s sets are the film’s steadiest pleasure: the Senate as a vast bowl of floating pods, Padmé’s flat with a sunset that seems to last for days, a city of sinkholes where the clone army lands on the walls like ants. Trisha Biggar dresses Natalie Portman in velvets and brocades so heavy she barely needs to move, which turns out to be convenient.

Because the script gives her nothing to do. Padmé is pregnant, frightened for her husband and confined to that flat, where she and Anakin tell each other how beautiful they are in the level voices of people reading from cards. Christensen is not a natural actor and Lucas does not help him; every line he is given is either an announcement or a complaint. He is better in silence. There is a wordless scene in which he and Portman stand at windows across the city from each other, and his face does what the dialogue cannot. It is the one moment in the first hour that feels like a film about people.

Ian McDiarmid is the reason to keep watching. Chancellor Palpatine spends the middle of the film taking Anakin aside, at the opera, in his office, in corridors, and telling him stories, and McDiarmid plays each one as a kindly uncle with something rotten just behind the smile. He purrs, he pauses, and when the mask finally comes off he has a wonderful time. McGregor, meanwhile, has quietly given the trilogy its best performance: he has found Alec Guinness’s cadence without doing an impression, and his Obi-Wan is dry, tired and fond, a man who knows the boy beside him is slipping and has no idea how to say so. Samuel L. Jackson’s Mace Windu is solemn to the point of furniture. Frank Oz’s Yoda gets one good fight and several sentences only he could make sound wise.

Then the turn comes, the one the title promises, and we will not describe how it is staged. What we can say is that Roger Barton and Ben Burtt cut the last stretch as two fights running at once, on two planets, and that John Williams gives them a choir and a brass line that rises through both. We had been bored through the Senate votes and the balcony scenes, properly bored. Then a montage of things going wrong across the galaxy at once, scored almost as a lament, caught us off guard, and we found we were moved, and slightly cross about it, because the writing had done so little to earn the feeling and Williams had done so much. The final duel, on a planet made of fire, is overlong and over-choreographed, and it still lands, because by then the film has stopped explaining itself.

Against Lucas’s own standard, Star Wars (1977) told a simple story and let the pictures do the talking. The Phantom Menace (1999) and Attack of the Clones (2002) told complicated ones and let nobody speak like a person. This one has the same trouble with words and then, in its last act, finds a way round it, mostly by cutting them. See it for McDiarmid, for McGregor and for the ending. It carries a 12A, and small children who came for the robots may find the last act harder going than the certificate suggests.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
14
Mixed
1
Negative
4
RogerEbert.com
19 May 2005 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

The film returns to classic space opera with spectacular action and effects that stimulate the imagination, making it a great entertainment despite weak dialogue.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
28 April 2025 · Christian Blauvelt
85*

The piece argues that time has been kind to the film, positioning it as George Lucas's most personal blockbuster and the best Star Wars movie overall due to its emotional depth and thematic resonance. It highlights how the prequel's messiness and personal vision contribute to its lasting appeal.

Read the full review →
Total Film
18 May 2015
80*

Flawed but enthralling, this is Star Wars’ darkest hour and sends the saga home on a high as the first among the prequels by a mighty stretch. It recaptures the magic of the franchise with pace, passion, purpose, and a jaw-flooring finale that crosses between duels and birth scenes with poetic cross-cutting.

Read the full review →
Vulture
25 April 2025 · Bilge Ebiri
80*

The review praises the film as the saddest and sincerest Star Wars entry, embracing bleak tragedy and the nature of evil in its second half while matching the saga's grim mood. It singles out the exploration of Anakin's rage and Palpatine's manipulation as particularly resonant.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
75*

Episode III is better than the other two much-derided prequels—leaner and funnier—while delivering a darker tale about power, control, and the dark side that functions as an adult movie for kids. Stylistic faults remain, including overload of technical trickery, cod language, and stagey acting, but Lucas redeems himself with this treatise that may frighten but ultimately welcomes viewers to the dark side.

Read the full review →
Empire
19 May 2005 · Colin Kennedy
70*

From a certain point of view, this is the best and most pleasing surprise in the saga, outclassing the earlier prequels with stronger effects, production design, and set pieces while addressing key myths. However, it is let down by rushed plotting, ludicrous dialogue, and an unconvincing dark-side turn for Anakin in the middle act.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2006

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling

MTV Movie Award for Best Villain, 2006

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Villain

Saturn Awards, 2006

Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…