Critics’ reviews

Sullivan's Travels (1941)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 86: 15 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Sullivan's Travels

86
Positive
15
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is firmly positive: all fifteen reviews favour Sullivan’s Travels, with praise centring on Preston Sturges’ satire of Hollywood seriousness and his defence of laughter. Critics repeatedly admire the crisp dialogue, inventive plotting and shifts between slapstick, romance and hardship. The performances draw praise too: Radio Times singles out McCrea and Lake, while other reviews applaud the supporting cast. Most critics find that the comedy gives its social concerns weight without becoming solemn.

The differences are chiefly in emphasis and enthusiasm, rather than substantial objections. Variety offers a more measured response, describing the mixture of grim tragedy and smart comedy as curious but effective. Sight and Sound concentrates on structural ingenuity and links to silent comedy; Slant Magazine stresses the film’s philosophical questions about humanism and representation. The supplied reviews contain few explicit reservations, even where their enthusiasm is more restrained.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Hails this sparkling satire as a classic comedy that strikes a winning balance between entertainment and conscience. Praises McCrea's best performance and Lake's star-making turn amid the vigorous action.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2014 · Angie Errigo
90*

The critic calls it a brilliant and funny comic masterpiece that has endured as a favourite among filmmakers and buffs, the granddaddy of movies about the film business. They single out Sturges' assured but light hand in steering between moods and genres, and the film's poignant affirmation of comedy's power.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 April 2015 · Clayton Dillard
90*

The critic hails the film as Hollywood's greatest comedy and lauds its rigorous philosophical inquiry into humanism, liberalism, and representation through ironic storytelling. They single out the chain-gang church sequence watching a Disney short as a standout moment of joy amid the satire.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
30 December 2013 · Erik Adams
90*

The critic calls the film Sturges' comic masterpiece and praises its insights into the Hollywood studio system and the power of laughter. They single out the rich irony in the protagonist's failed attempts to experience real hardship and the uplifting climactic epiphany.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 May 2000
90*

The critic praises Preston Sturges' 1941 film as having irresistible charm and energy, following a high-minded director who disguises himself as a hobo to experience real life. It is described as coming as close as possible to a distillation of pure happiness, with marvellous supporting performances.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 January 1942 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The film is a trenchant satire on social significance in pictures and a sardonic defense of Hollywood make-believe. It is expertly made and acted, with the best social comment on Hollywood since A Star Is Born.

Read the full review →
Time Out
17 August 2012 · TM
90*

Calls it an irresistible gem and almost serious comedy that skewers liberal solemnities in problem pictures. Praises the wonderful dialogue, eccentric characterisations and superlative performances.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 August 2015 · Vikram Murthi
80*

The piece presents the film as a classic for discussion, highlighting Sturges' satirical take on Hollywood pretensions and social commentary. It notes the film's tonal shifts and enduring relevance as a comedy with depth.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 September 2005 · Brad Stevens
80*

Praises the box set of Sturges' Paramount comedies as a welcome rediscovery of his inventive, modern-feeling work that anticipates later cinema. Singles out Sullivan's Travels for its evocation of silent comedy, structural ingenuity and anticipation of modernist films like 8½.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 January 2023 · Richard Brody
80*

Sturges’s ingenious plot mixes lighthearted romance with grimly realistic drama, brought to life with a remarkable profusion of scintillating dialogue that addresses the viewer directly.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The piece presents it as a self-referential lesson in the entertainment value of filmmaking as opposed to its social value, with the director learning the meaning of life and the value of laughter in softening the human condition. It notes the plot involving a Hollywood director seeking material for a serious film while living as a hobo.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1940 · Variety Staff
70*

A curious but effective mixture of grim tragedy, slapstick and smart comedy that ties everything together neatly while keeping the audience engaged; Sturges’ dialog is trenchant and crisp.

Read the full review →
Collider
21 May 2015 · Andre Dellamorte
90*

The critic calls Sullivan's Travels a canonical work and one of the best Hollywood satires, praising its blend of class commentary and delightful set pieces that affirm the value of escapism and comedy.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
1 May 2005 · Stephanie Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic praises it as one of the great classic comedies that combines a meaningful story with subtle moral overtones, lightness, and humour. They single out the film's verve, wit, compassion, and unique insight into the minds of yesteryear moviemakers and Sturges himself.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
21 April 2015 · The Playlist Staff
90*

The piece calls it the most perfect of Sturges' films, praising its focus, moral, tone shifts, pathos, peril, irony, and love story, noting how it earns its satisfying conclusion about the value of making people laugh.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate