Critics’ reviews

Superman III (1983)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 56: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Superman III

56
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews lean mixed, with praise clustering around Christopher Reeve, the Smallville scenes and individual comic sequences rather than the film as a whole. Reeve’s handling of the dual role remains a strength even for detractors, while the relationship between Clark Kent and Annette O’Toole’s character supplies welcome warmth. The opening slapstick also earns approval from otherwise opposed reviews, suggesting that the comedy works better in particular passages than across the full film.

The spread is wide, and the main divide concerns the lighter tone. The Hollywood Reporter welcomes Richard Lester’s brisk direction and finds an energetic audience-pleaser. Time Out admires the satire and precisely timed slapstick. Less favourable reviews find the broad humour overdone, Richard Pryor poorly used, and the drama short of its predecessors’ wonder and scope. Two of the eight reviews lack accessible text, so their specific reasoning cannot be established.

The Hollywood Reporter
9 June 1983 · Arthur Knight
80*

Knight finds the film great fun and an energetic audience-pleaser, despite some letdowns. He especially praises Richard Lester’s brisk direction and Annette O’Toole’s warmth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
74*

The review presents the film as the series’ most satirical entry. It singles out the opening credits’ precisely timed slapstick as especially impressive.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 June 1983 · Janet Maslin
63*

The article text is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. Its praise or complaint cannot be reliably identified from the accessible page.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
62*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. The available page contains only a browser-check message.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Ferguson finds the humour uneven and says the film cannot sustain the irreverence of its predecessor. He praises Superman’s turn to nastiness and the sweet Smallville scenes, while finding Richard Pryor’s comic presence ineffective.

Read the full review →
Empire
30 March 2007 · William Thomas
38*

Thomas finds the film lighter and less dramatically compelling than its predecessors, despite some good action. He praises Christopher Reeve’s command of his dual role but faults the film’s whimsical tone and diminished sense of wonder.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1982 · Variety Staff
30*

The review finds Superman III a disappointment, criticizing its broad-comedy focus and lack of the earlier films’ mythic scope. It praises the pre-credits sequence as hilarious and notes the appealing relationship between Clark Kent and Annette O’Toole’s character.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 July 2009 · Stephen Carty
35*

Carty considers Superman III the weakest instalment so far, though still worth watching for Christopher Reeve. He praises the Smallville story arc and Reeve’s performance, while criticizing the overdone comedy and Richard Pryor’s miscasting.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate