Critics’ reviews

Swept Away (2002)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 27: 0 positive, 0 mixed, 11 negative.

Back to our review of Swept Away

27
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
11

The consensus on Swept Away is uniformly negative: all eleven reviews find the remake unsuccessful, with criticism clustering around its loss of the original’s class and sexual politics. Most critics argue that the replacement romance offers little emotional interest, leaving the central relationship unconvincing and the dialogue lifeless. Madonna’s performance draws repeated complaints about a lack of humour, warmth or depth, while several reviews question the film’s treatment of its female lead.

The differences concern how badly it fails and what, if anything, survives. The Guardian finds some merit in Ritchie’s slick shooting and editing, while Variety regards the result as a straightforward misfire rather than an exceptional fiasco. Slant Magazine offers the clearest dissent on Madonna, praising her performance in the island section despite rejecting much of the film. These concessions keep the criticism from being identical, but none amounts to a recommendation.

The Guardian
15 October 2002 · John Patterson
40*

The remake half works thanks to Ritchie's slick shooting and editing, but Madonna gives an ordinary, unremarkable performance as the socialite and the camera is merciless on her appearance.

Read the full review →
Empire
· William Thomas
30*

The critic finds the film genuinely poor despite the pre-release backlash, calling it a failed remake that abandons its source's political elements for an unengaging central relationship. Madonna's character is singled out as one-dimensional and irritating.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
14 October 2002
30*

The film is a misconceived and unappealing romantic comedy that lives down to its advance word of mouth. It strips the original's political content, resulting in a feature that makes very little dramatic or emotional sense and becomes a soppy romance then over-the-top tragedy.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 October 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
30*

The remake is not the total disaster expected, though the first half is unwatchable; it loses the original's class warfare and socio-political edge in favor of an S&M-tinged fantasy, with a sentimental compromise ending. Madonna gives a strong performance in the submissive role once the island strandings begin.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 October 2002 · Scott Tobias
30*

Ritchie's version softens the original's provocative class and sexual politics into a silly, lightweight romantic comedy that backfires, turning abuse and resentment into foreplay and laughs while burying any real point. It lacks conviction and ends up feeling like a misguided attempt to please everyone.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 October 2002
30*

The misguided remake is a simple misfire rather than a world-class fiasco, alternating between the painless and turgid. The review singles out the lack of interest in class-divided social satire and the humorless headline performance for complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 October 2002 · A. O. Scott
25*

The film is a soggy and superfluous motion picture that washes ashore as a pointless remake. Scott singles out the loss of the original's sharp-elbowed politics and the mechanical, heatless performances for complaint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 October 2002 · Manohla Dargis
20*

Ritchie's update is even less plausible than the original and proves incapable of sustaining a scene or mood. Dargis singles out the director's evident dislike of women and the debased, sadistic treatment of the female lead for complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
· Sloan Freer
20

Guy Ritchie's insipid vehicle for his then-wife Madonna is a lifeless and occasionally misogynistic bore that went straight to video in the UK. Ritchie's direction and script are so unimaginative it's like watching a bad 1970s TV drama.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
11 October 2002 · Roger Ebert
20*

The remake is a sentimental misfire that strips away the original's politics and social observation, turning it into an inarticulate situation romance. Ebert singles out the lack of any juice or life in the characters and their conversations for complaint.

Read the full review →
/Film
24 August 2025 · Jeremy Smith
15*

The critic views Ritchie's remake as an unnecessary and painful misfire that lacks the original's point or bite, resulting in one of the director's weakest efforts. Madonna's casting and the overall execution are singled out as particularly ill-advised.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate