Critics’ reviews

Take Shelter (2011)

21 reviews from 21 publications. Critics’ score 81: 20 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Take Shelter

81
Positive
20
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Take Shelter, with praise centred on Michael Shannon’s performance as a family man troubled by apocalyptic visions. The reviews repeatedly describe his work as nuanced and vulnerable, giving the psychological terror a convincing domestic basis. Jeff Nichols’s control of creeping dread also draws broad approval, particularly where fears about mental illness meet the anxiety of losing a secure family life. Several critics find the small details of marriage and community as affecting as the threatening imagery.

Reservations concern the slow pace, an overextended final act and occasional awkwardness in combining supernatural horror with everyday drama. Approval is otherwise closely grouped, with one sharply negative outlier. The Guardian finds the film incoherent and its ending a cop-out, while The Telegraph praises that ending’s boldness. Even among favourable reviews, the handling of the conclusion remains a point of disagreement.

RogerEbert.com
5 October 2011 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic praises the film's quiet exploration of spreading dread and anxiety about losing a good life amid possible disasters. Michael Shannon's performance as the tormented family man is highlighted as powerfully evocative.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 May 2011 · festival review · David Rooney
90*

The critic calls it a masterfully controlled prestige picture about a man's mental collapse, praising its precise mood modulation, emotional accuracy, craftsmanship, and imagery. Shannon's lead performance is highlighted as exceptionally convincing.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 September 2011 · NYT Critic’s Pick · A.O. Scott
90*

The review describes the film as a remarkable, quiet exploration of latent terrors in contemporary American life. It singles out the anxiety of losing a good life and the masterful performances for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
24 November 2011
90*

Michael Shannon delivers a riveting performance in this slow-burn parable about apocalyptic visions, shot with ominous beauty. Nichols sustains tension and delivers a gutsy ending without short-changing the audience, making it one of 2011's standout films.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 September 2011 · Sheri Linden
85*

The critic commends the film's pre-apocalyptic dread and Michael Shannon's nuanced, compassionate performance as a man possibly cracking up or prescient. It highlights the wrenching depiction of family love in the climactic shelter scene.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
25 September 2011 · Bill Weber
85*

Nichols viscerally connects viewers to the protagonist's deteriorating mental state via Shannon's taciturn yet vulnerable performance, rendering rural settings both pacific and threatening. Some missteps occur with nightmare staging and therapy-drama elements, but the film sustains dread about a good man facing a cursed fate.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 January 2011 · festival review · Justin Chang
85*

The review calls it a hallucinatory thriller that confirms Jeff Nichols's talent, anchored by Michael Shannon's resonant performance as a man driven by apocalyptic visions. It praises the domestic drama and sense of dread in a troubled world.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 September 2011 · B+ · Noel Murray
83

Nichols develops a mood of creeping dread through Shannon's performance as a man plagued by apocalyptic visions, though the film moves too slowly with some clumsy plotting. It focuses effectively on how family and community react to one man's mania.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 November 2011 · Angie Errigo
80*

Nichols’ intense drama is disturbing and unsettling, with Shannon delivering a tour de force as a man cracking up under the strains of normality. The film builds extraordinary palpable dread, though it is overlong and falters in its depiction of a working-class community.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
24 November 2011 · 3/4/3 · Adam Woodward
80

The critic praises the lead performances by Shannon and Chastain as a compelling force but finds the blend of supernatural horror and suburban drama uneven, suggesting more restraint would strengthen the impact.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 May 2011 · festival review
80*

Nichols combines inner and outer storms effectively in this compelling psychological thriller about a man's descent into schizophrenia, which also reflects post-9/11 and financial crisis anxieties in middle America; Shannon gives a riveting, empathetic lead performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 September 2011 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Nichols delivers a major, ambitious state-of-the-nation film that captures middle-American desperation through a man's apocalyptic visions; Shannon's intense performance anchors this flawed but resonant work.

Read the full review →
Total Film
23 November 2011 · James Mottram
75*

A beguiling mix of psychological terror and social realism, boldly executed with poetic visuals and strong performances from Shannon and Chastain. Nichols shows excellent control of mood and themes, though the final act is overlong.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 November 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
35*

The film mixes elements of The Happening and The Tree of Life but fails to cohere, with some visual moments undermined by an absurd cop-out ending. It becomes a self-important shaggy dog story rather than a compelling human dilemma about possible hallucinations or real apocalypse.

Read the full review →
Collider
26 September 2011 · A- · Scott Wampler
90

The critic calls it an excellent, powerful little film with one of Michael Shannon’s finest performances and a haunting final image. They single out Shannon’s nuanced portrayal of a potentially paranoid family man for particular acclaim.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 November 2011 · Jennie Kermode
90*

The critic calls it an astounding film about an ordinary family facing extraordinary struggles, with mythic overtones and a clash of realities. Michael Shannon's remarkable performance and the emotionally powerful ending are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
29 September 2011 · festival review · The Playlist Staff
85*

The review praises the film's naturalistic and novelistic portrayal of madness and potential apocalypse through Curtis's visions and actions. It highlights Michael Shannon's performance and the ambiguity of whether the threat is real or imagined.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
18 October 2011 · festival review · Simon Reynolds
80*

The review commends the compelling dive into a psyche spiraling into the abyss, with Shannon delivering a nuanced and layered performance. The journey is described as riveting, with the ambiguous ending leaving much to ponder.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
25 November 2011 · ★★★★ · Jon Lyus
80

The review describes an unflinching meditation on control and mercy, with a compelling central performance by Michael Shannon as a man protecting his family amid mental strain. Nichols's handling of the family's internal collapse and the ambiguity of the visions are highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
25 November 2011 · ★★★★ · Chris Fyvie
80

The critic highlights Shannon's performance of genuine depth and power at the center of this haunting drama on mental illness. Nichols is praised for creating palpable menace and tension, with the intimacy of the family story making it truly heartbreaking, despite the curveball ending.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 November 2011 · 4 out of 5 · Michael Leader
70*

The critic praises the film's subversion of the protective father trope through a psychological lens and highlights Michael Shannon's standout performance as Curtis. The small domestic details and family dynamics are singled out as strengths, though the confounding ending is noted as potentially divisive.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate