Critics’ reviews

Taste of Cherry (1997)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 68: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Taste of Cherry

68
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics take the film to be Kiarostami at his most distilled: a man drives the outskirts of Tehran asking strangers to help him with his own death, and the pleasure, such as it is, lies in the talk and the terrain rather than in incident. Praise clusters around the direction and the plain, patient shooting, with several reviews singling out the conversations with the men he picks up, one about the sweetness of fruit in particular, and the dusty industrial landscape. Seven of nine call it a serious and humane piece of work.

The dissent is sharp rather than mild. Roger Ebert finds it excruciatingly dull and calls the slow, monotone style an affectation; Empire likes the shifts of scenery and colour but feels cheated by the ending. Even admirers hedge on that ending, which Variety expects to disappoint some, though The Playlist argues that calling the film dull misses the point. The spread is wide: enthusiasm or impatience, little in between.

Los Angeles Times
27 March 1998 · Kevin Thomas
90*

Kiarostami’s soaring parable follows a middle-aged man in Tehran seeking someone to bury him after his planned suicide, turning into an odyssey on life’s meaning and human dignity through encounters with various men. Every shot attests to the director’s mastery, inviting viewers to think deeply about life and nature’s consolations.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
24 July 2020 · Budd Wilkins
90*

The critic praises Kiarostami’s understated rumination on existential despair and suicide, highlighting the film's use of landscape, conversations with outsiders, and the remarkable transition from fiction to behind-the-scenes footage with music.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 September 1997 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Stephen Holden
70*

Kiarostami contrasts the vitality of Iranian working life with the suicidal despair of a middle-aged man driving around Tehran seeking someone to bury him after he takes sleeping pills. The film offers an epic yet minuscule vision of human scale and dignity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
70*

The critic describes the film's slow revelation of a man's search for help with his planned suicide, drawing viewers into his psychological and ethical dilemma. They praise the subtle, deceptively simple mise-en-scène, particularly a noisy industrial desert scene and the ambiguous penultimate sequence.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 May 1997 · festival review · Deborah Young
70*

Kiarostami’s linear and accessible parable follows a despairing man seeking discreet help to bury him after suicide, with a bleak premise partially offset by arguments for nature’s consolations, though the abrupt cerebral ending may disappoint some. The director cuts masterfully with fable-like repetitions and symbolic visuals.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
30*

The critic finds the film fascinating for its subtle shifts of scenery and colour but questions its Palme d'Or win and criticises the ending for leaving viewers feeling deprived.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
27 February 1998 · ★/4 · Roger Ebert
25

The critic finds the film excruciatingly boring and not a worthwhile viewing experience, despite acknowledging its humanistic intentions and the director's courage in addressing suicide. He argues that the slow, monotone style is an affectation that fails to engage or benefit the subject matter.

Read the full review →
Paste
11 July 2016 · Dom Sinacola
90*

The film is an existential tone poem of deliberate pace following a man seeking help with suicide, ultimately becoming a transcendental meditation on life, death, and human connection. The critic singles out the taxidermist's conversation about the sweetness of mulberries and seasonal fruits, along with the film's transcendent conclusion and behind-the-scenes coda, as elements that reveal its profound beauty upon rewatch.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
13 February 2013 · A- · The Playlist Staff
90

The critic finds the film patient and languid, disagreeing with those who dismiss it as dull or self-indulgent. They praise Kiarostami’s humanism and the film’s oblique qualities, along with its beautifully plain shooting style and the baffling but brilliant coda featuring behind-the-scenes footage set to Louis Armstrong.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate