Critics’ reviews

Terminator Salvation (2009)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 46: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Terminator Salvation

46
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
6

The reviews lean negative, with six of twelve against and only four clearly in favour, but almost everyone agrees on where the film’s strengths lie. The action and the hardware get the praise: the future-war setting, the variety of machine designs and the set-pieces, with even the harshest notices allowing that one desert chase stands with the best in the series. Among the cast, Sam Worthington’s Marcus Wright is the performance most often singled out, and Anton Yelchin’s Kyle Reese picks up several mentions.

The complaints gather around the people rather than the metal. Most critics find the human drama thin, John Connor underwritten and Christian Bale given little to do, and a few miss the humour and irony of the earlier films. The spread is wide: Empire calls it a clear step up from the third instalment, while The Guardian finds it dull and Time Out a mess. Slant goes furthest, saying it finishes the series off.

Empire
20 May 2009 · empire
75*

The critic finds the film pretty damn good overall and a big step up from Terminator 3, praising its propulsive plot, exciting set-pieces and strong performances from Christian Bale and Anton Yelchin. They single out the fresh men-on-a-mission structure and variety of robot designs for praise.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
18 May 2009
70*

The machines should get top billing in this dark fourth instalment; it makes up in stylish visuals and thunderous action for what it lacks in human drama and narrative focus.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 May 2009 · A.O. Scott
70*

The film is a sturdy and serviceable sequel with brute integrity, efficient storytelling, and mastery of chases, fights, and explosions. McG manages speed and technomayhem with aplomb despite lacking a signature style.

Read the full review →
Total Film
20 May 2009 · Simon Edwards
70*

The critic says McG largely delivers on the future-war premise with exciting action and hardware, highlighting Sam Worthington's full arc and performance as the standout. They single out the strong set-pieces for praise while noting weaker character work outside the main quartet and limited accessibility for newcomers.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 May 2009 · Betsy Sharkey
60*

The movie delivers pyrotechnics and heavy artillery for fans but loses the chess match tension between man and machine; Sam Worthington's Marcus Wright steals the show as the conflicted warrior. Bale's John Connor struggles to anchor the chaos.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 May 2009 · The Associated Press
30*

The film delivers plenty of crunching heavy metal action in its post-apocalyptic setting but offers little dramatic life or satisfying human element. It is not the same without Schwarzenegger, resulting in terminally sullen results unlikely to match the scale of bigger blockbusters.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
25 May 2009 · Anthony Lane
30*

The film is a confused, humorless grind that has lost the irony and fun of earlier entries, with oversized machines and self-important tone dominating. Performances and design fail to lift the weary saga.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 May 2009
20*

McG fails to deepen the series' timeline or storytelling and instead shifts to a lighter, impersonal Transformers-like approach with one-note characters and escapable machines. The film is rife with dumb callbacks, lacks internal logic, and finishes off the Terminator series.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 June 2009 · Peter Bradshaw
20*

The critic finds the film a fantastically dull fourth episode that brings the franchise to a creative standstill. He singles out the uninvolving action sequences and Christian Bale's dull performance for complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
2 June 2009 · Tom Huddleston
20*

It is a shambolic, deafening, intelligence-insulting mess and a crushing failure on almost all counts, though one desert chase scene rivals anything in the series.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
26 May 2009 · ★★★ · Duncan Bowles
60

The critic is torn between enjoying the film as spectacle and finding it lacking in emotional depth and heart. They single out the strong final act and Anton Yelchin's portrayal of Kyle Reese for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 May 2009 · Anton Bitel
30*

The critic sees the film as a stopgap more interested in setting up sequels than standing on its own, with impressive but unremarkable SFX and an underwritten John Connor role that wastes Christian Bale.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate