Critics’ reviews

Tess (1979)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 72: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Tess

72
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics admire Tess, and the praise gathers almost entirely around how it looks. Review after review names the colour photography and the production design as the film’s chief virtues, with one critic likening the scale to David Lean. Nastassja Kinski’s performance draws steady approval, described as delicate and deeply moving. A number of critics also note how unlikely a project this seems for Polanski, and read it through his own history and his recurring interest in innocence spoiled.

The reservations start where the beauty ends. The New Yorker finds the film smooth and hypnotic but tame, going soft on Hardy’s rawer material and reducing Tess to a pure victim. Empire calls it good in parts but far too long, blaming the pace on fidelity to the novel. Time Out goes furthest, judging it cloying and hollow, more interested in the director’s preoccupations than the book’s. The spread is wide, though the dissenters are a minority.

Slant Magazine
25 February 2014 · Budd Wilkins
90*

The critic emphasizes the film's ravishing visual poetry and personal resonance for Polanski, connecting it to themes of exploitation and loss seen in Chinatown, while praising the Criterion Blu-ray's transfer and extensive extras on the adaptation and production.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 March 2013
85*

The critic calls the film an outstanding piece of work. They single out Nastassja Kinski's deeply moving performance as Tess and the ravishing cinematography for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1978 · Variety Staff
85*

Polanski has delivered a sensitive, intelligent screen treatment that combines fidelity to the novel with beauty. First-rate contributions include the color photography and superb production design.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 February 2014 · B+ · Ben Kenigsberg
83

The critic highlights the film's sumptuous visuals and cinematography as a departure toward epic scope for Polanski, likening it to David Lean while tying it thematically to his personal history and recurring motifs of innocence defiled. It notes the strong 4K restoration and bonus features on the Criterion release.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 December 1980 · Janet Maslin
80*

Polanski has turned Hardy's novel into a lovely, lyrical, unexpectedly delicate movie that might seem an unlikely project for him. It stands as one of the best films of the season for its handsome, sweeping and deft adaptation.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 January 1981 · Pauline Kael
60*

The film is a sustained feat of craftsmanship that is textured, smooth and hypnotic but tame and lacking in Hardy's visual passion and emotional danger. Kinski gives a delicate performance as a pure sufferer, but the movie reduces Tess to a victim and goes soft on the story's raw elements.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Patrick Humphries
50*

The critic finds the adaptation lengthy and lyrical but criticizes its ponderous pace due to fidelity to the novel and Polanski's relocation of the setting. It is insufferably long but very good in parts.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · FD
40*

The adaptation has visual beauty and lush elements but feels cloying and hollow overall. It prioritizes the director's preoccupations over the novel's themes and omits key details from the source material.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate