Critics’ reviews

The 39 Steps (1935)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 89: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The 39 Steps

89
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimously positive, with praise centred on Hitchcock’s brisk direction and the ease with which the chase thriller accommodates romantic comedy. Critics repeatedly single out the handcuffed courtship and crofter’s cottage sequence, while Robert Donat’s performance earns approval for moving between humour and fear. His pairing with Madeleine Carroll is another recurring strength. Most critics also stress the film’s influence, finding the foundations of Hitchcock’s later thrillers in its wrong-man story, resourceful set pieces and mixture of suspense and wit.

Reservations are minor and the spread is narrow. The Guardian finds the opening creaky, while Eye for Film notes dated accents and dialogue delivery; neither considers these faults a serious obstacle to enjoyment. Differences are chiefly matters of emphasis: alongside the widespread appreciation of the entertainment, Slant Magazine draws attention to alienation and doubt beneath the charming spy adventure.

The AV Club
18 July 2012 · A · Scott Tobias
95

The critic calls the film the ultimate distillation of Hitchcock’s strengths and the genetic material for later masterpieces, praising its fat-free efficiency as a thriller infused with screwball romantic comedy that explores issues of trust with maturity and cool sophistication.

Read the full review →
Empire
17 August 2016 · Kim Newman
90*

The review celebrates the film's enduring influence on thrillers and action cinema, noting how Hitchcock's inventions have been borrowed repeatedly. It singles out the handcuffed escape sequence and the emotionally charged crofter scene for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
29 June 2012 · Andy Klein
90*

The review praises the 1935 film as a work of pure entertainment that out-Hollywoods Hollywood, with a thriller plot delivered in a comic, Capra-like tone of a bickering couple on the run destined to fall in love. It highlights the film's influential structure and the strong Criterion restoration transfer.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
15 July 2012 · Chuck Bowen
90*

The review presents the film as one of Hitchcock’s most deceptive great movies—a charming spy adventure that is really a sigh of doubt disguised as a slick pop bauble, highlighting its fleet and inventive direction, subtextual meaning in every shot, and humanist themes of alienation and the wrong-man plot.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 July 2012 · Michael Sragow
90*

The piece hails the film as the source of contemporary escapist entertainment, praising its blend of paranoid fantasy and fulfilled fantasy in the handcuffed odd-couple courtship between Hannay and the cool blonde. It singles out the erotic tension and the director's shrewd formula as enduring strengths.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 September 2014 · GB
90*

The critic praises it as a ripping good yarn with Donat's smooth Hannay on the run from police and spies, featuring set pieces like the crofter's cottage and handcuffed scenes with the heroine. It is described as great fun, an anthology of Hitchcock motifs drawn loosely from Buchan's novel.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1934 · Variety Staff
90*

The critic calls it a zippy, punchy romantic melodrama that twists and spins artfully through high-powered sequences while holding entertainment value like steel cable. Donat gives a strong performance ranging from humor to horror, and the light romance with Carroll nicely colors the spy chase.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 April 2008
80*

The critic finds Alfred Hitchcock's 1935 thriller still massively entertaining despite a creaky start. They single out its witty, daring and exuberant qualities and the director's energetic and resourceful handling of the plot and locale changes.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
30 October 2012 · A · The Playlist Staff
95

The critic calls it probably the first truly great Hitchcock picture, a gripping and enormously entertaining chase thriller that feels timeless. It praises the witty script, strong performances by Robert Donat and Madeleine Carroll, and how it establishes the director's signature formula.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 April 2025 · Zach Laws
90*

The critic praises the film as a foundational Hitchcock thriller that showcases the director's emerging style through its blend of action, suspense, romance, and humor. The MacGuffin-driven plot and set pieces are highlighted as particularly effective.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 April 2008 · Daniel Hooper
80*

The critic praises it as one of Hitchcock's finer British films and a prototype for his later Hollywood classics like Notorious and North by Northwest. It highlights the film's enduring entertainment value, classic scenes, and ahead-of-its-time elements despite some dated aspects like accents and dialogue delivery.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate