Critics’ reviews

The Age of Innocence (1993)

8 reviews from 8 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of The Age of Innocence

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The Times
17 March 2023 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

Scorsese’s most uncharacteristic film is also one of his finest: a visually sumptuous adaptation pulsing with frustrated tension and unspoken sadness. The electrifying chemistry between Day-Lewis and Pfeiffer, the tribal order of society and the shattering final scene are highlighted as masterful.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 January 1994 · Adam Mars-Jones
85*

Scorsese reformulates his style for a softer subject, taking the past seriously with meticulous detail and a subtler dynamism suited to a world of indirection and etiquette. The film excels in conveying hypocrisy as the secret strength of high society while delivering a poignant romance through virtuoso cinematic language.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
80*

Scorsese delivers a ravishing, obsessively detailed adaptation of Edith Wharton's novel, with impeccable production values, music, and editing that immerse viewers in 1870s New York high society. The performances, especially Ryder's revelation as May, and the craft of America's greatest living director make it ecstasy for fans of well-told stories of love and denial.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 March 2023 · Peter Bradshaw

Scorsese’s adaptation of Edith Wharton is a gorgeous, visually breathtaking tragedy of manners and concealed guilt in 1870s New York society. Day-Lewis and Pfeiffer are powerfully matched as the guilty lovers, with superb production design, costumes and supporting turns singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 September 1993 · Anthony Lane

Scorsese delivers a serious, technically dazzling adaptation that captures the shock of the old through lavish period detail and strong performances, especially Day-Lewis. The film falls short of the novel's moral depth and hard-edged satire, treating history more as spectacle than a site of genuine emotional struggle.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 September 1993 · Vincent Canby

Scorsese has crafted a gorgeously uncharacteristic film that serves as a window onto a newly discovered world of 1870s New York high society. The director's outsider fascination with the era's manners and customs matches Wharton's own bittersweet recollection of privilege and constraint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA

Scorsese's magnificent adaptation of Edith Wharton's novel centers on Newland Archer's love for his fiancée's unconventional cousin, Countess Olenska, in 1870s New York high society. The director uses expressive style, sumptuous mise-en-scène and ironic narration to convey the erotic tension and repression of an etiquette-obsessed elite, making it his most poignantly moving film.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 August 1993 · festival review · Todd McCarthy

The film is an extraordinarily sumptuous and impeccably faithful adaptation, with peerless production values and evocative attention to period mores. The material's emotional starchiness and propriety ultimately limit its dramatic impact despite Scorsese's skillful handling.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate